Lagman revives divorce bill | Inquirer News

Lagman revives divorce bill

/ 05:00 AM July 04, 2022

Edcel Lagman. STORY: Lagman revives divorce bill

Albay 1st District Rep. Edcel Lagman. (File photo by NOY MORCOSO / INQUIRER.net)

MANILA, Philippines — Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman has filed anew a bill that would legalize divorce, saying the state “cannot abandon couples and their children in a house on fire.”

In filing House Bill No. 78, or the proposed “Absolute Divorce Act,” Lagman maintained that the measure is “an apt sequel to the Reproductive Health Act,” claiming that divorce is also a women’s rights issue.

Article continues after this advertisement

In his explanatory note, the Albay representative pointed out: “It is fact that some marriages break down even with the couples’ resolute and repeated efforts to solve differences and reconcile.”

FEATURED STORIES

He noted that divorce is primarily an issue on women’s rights, saying, “Not being able to get out of a loveless, unhappy, even abusive marriage is a human rights concern for women.”

“When there is physical violence in a relationship, women are almost always at the receiving end of a fist or an open palm and it is the obligation of the State to ensure this does not intensify to the use of a knife or firearm,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The lawmaker pointed out that, through the Absolute Divorce Act, “beleaguered and tormented wives can soon be liberated from irretrievably dysfunctional marriages or inordinately abusive marital relations.”

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Lagman, absolute divorce is “definitely not for couples in harmonious, happy and vibrant marital relationships,” but is “for the exceptional cases when the marital union is irremediably severed.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Under the measure, court proceedings for absolute divorce would be made “affordable, expeditious and inexpensive.”

Grounds for divorce include physical abuse; moral pressure to change religious or political affiliations; attempt to induce a child to engage in prostitution or connivance in such; final judgment of over six years of imprisonment; drug addiction, habitual alcoholism or chronic gambling; homosexuality; bigamy; marital infidelity or perversion; attempt on the life of petitioner and unjustified abandonment.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Gabriela hopes to revive divorce bill

Divorce should not be an ‘easy’ option for couples – Marcos

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Unhappy spouses in England, Wales cheer ‘no-fault divorce’

TAGS: Divorce bill, Edcel Lagman

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.