Muntinlupa court dismisses contempt case vs De Lima, lawyer | Inquirer News

Muntinlupa court dismisses contempt case vs De Lima, lawyer

/ 04:43 PM May 27, 2022

De Lima accepts defeat in 2022 senatorial polls: I don’t have any regrets

FILE PHOTO: Senator Leila de Lima, reelectionist in the May 9, 2022, polls. Image from her Twitter account

MANILA, Philippines — The Muntinlupa Regional Trial Court dismisses the indirect contempt case against detained Senator Leila de Lima and her lawyer Filibon Tacardon for “lack of merit.”

In its 32-page ruling, the court found no basis in proceeding with the indirect contempt charge by government prosecutors against the senator, who is detained at the PNP Custodial Center for drug charges.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last year, both de Lima and Tacardon were charged with indirect contempt for statements made before the media. They said government witnesses from the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) and the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) testified that they could not find any transactions linking the senator to the prison drug trade.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: De Lima cleared by PDEA, AMLC – lawyer

Based on the complaint by state prosecutors, Tacardon’s statement with the express imprimatur of de Lima is inaccurate.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Muntinlupa Court, in dismissing the case, said the statements to the media made by Atty. Tacardon “did not constitute a ‘clear and present danger’ to the administration of justice.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The court said Tacardon’s statement to the media is consistent with the testimony of the witnesses.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The supposed admissions reported by respondent Atty. Tacardon to the media were not fabricated, edited, slanted, or couched in such a manner that it may influence the judge,” said the court adding that what de Lima’s lawyer did was plain reporting of what happened inside the court.

The court said if Tacardon cannot be held liable for indirect contempt, so is Sen. de Lima who supposedly authorized the release of such statements.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORY:

Gov’t prosecutors file contempt raps vs. de Lima lawyer

EDV
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: contempt charges

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.