Duterte urged to 'intervene,' resolve DMW 'confusion' | Inquirer News

Duterte urged to ‘intervene,’ resolve DMW ‘confusion’

/ 11:39 PM April 28, 2022
Sec. Abdullah Mama-o


MANILA, Philippines — Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon on Thursday called on President Rodrigo Duterte to now “intervene” with the “confusion” the lawmaker said was caused by the actions of Department of Migrant Workers (DMW) Secretary Abdullah Mama-o.

“I urge the President to intervene for the sake of the labor sector and migrant workers that we seek to protect with the passage of the Republic Act 11641. Mama-o’s actions are sowing confusion. Only the President has the authority to do so under the Constitution, because he has control over the executive and all its departments,” Drilon said in a statement.


“The President is bound by the Constitution to ensure that all laws are faithfully executed. Mama-o’s actions are illegal since he cannot perform the function of a full-fledged secretary until the Department of Migrant Workers is fully constituted. That is clear under the law,” he stressed.

This, after Mama-o issued a department order lifting the deployment ban on Filipino new hires to Saudi Arabia, a directive that Labor Secretary Silvestre Bello III countered.


Bello said that the deployment ban remains in place, adding that the DMW has yet to be fully constituted.

Drilon, a former labor secretary, sided with Bello.

“The jurisdiction still remains with Secretary Bello, because the Department of Migrant Workers does not exist yet. We have a transitory provision in the law that Mama-o should recognize and respect,” the senator said.

He cited Section 23 of R.A. 11641, which he said clearly states that the DMW shall not be constituted without an appropriation in the 2023 General Appropriations Act, an effective implementing rules and regulations, and a staffing pattern.

‘Illegal’ appointment?

Further, Drilon, a former executive secretary, said Mama-o’s appointment was “illegal,” reiterating that the new department is yet to be constituted, including the staffing pattern in order to create the positions, including the position of secretary, in a yet-to-be-constituted.

“[T]he appointment of Mama-o is just to be a member of the transition committee. It is the height of absurdity and clearly against legislative intent to allow the new appointee to determine policies without an actual department. The intention was to allow for a smooth transition and turnover and this is the exact opposite of that,” Drilon’s statement read.

The senator likewise renewed his warning to Mama-o that he could be held liable for usurpation of authority if he continues to exercise the functions of a department which has yet to be constituted.


This, as Drilon called the appointment of Mama-o as the “root cause of all the confusion and policy disputes that sent shock to the labor and migrant workers industry.”

“It is about time that the President intervenes and resolves the conflict created by the appointment of Mama-o. To allow this situation to continue is detrimental to the interest of the labor sector and the OFWs,” Drilon said.

The minority leader pointed out that under Article VII, Sec. 17 of the Constitution, the “President shall have control of all the executive departments, bureaus, and offices.”

“He shall ensure that the laws be faithfully executed,” Drilon also noted, still citing the 1987 Constitution.


Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Department of Migrant Workers, DMW, Secretary Abdullah Mama-o, Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.