Australia worried China will bring Hong Kong police techniques to Solomons | Inquirer News

Australia worried China will bring Hong Kong police techniques to Solomons

/ 03:15 PM April 27, 2022

Australia worried China will bring Hong Kong police techniques to Solomons

National flags of Solomon Islands and China flutter at the Tiananmen Square in Beijing, China October 7, 2019. REUTERS

SYDNEY — Australia’s spy chief says Canberra is concerned Chinese police deployed to the Solomon Islands under a new security pact could use “ruthless” techniques previously used to quell anti-government protests in Hong Kong.

Andrew Shearer, the director-general of the Office of National Intelligence, travelled to the Pacific islands nation last month in a failed attempt to persuade Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare not to sign a security pact with China that has alarmed the United States and its allies.

Article continues after this advertisement

While details of the pact have not been disclosed, Sogavare has ruled out a military base and said it covers domestic policing.

FEATURED STORIES

Shearer told the Raisina Dialogue conference in New Delhi that Australia responded within eight hours to Sogavare’s request in November for police assistance to quell riots.

Deployed Australian police sit under the command of the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force through a bilateral security treaty.

Article continues after this advertisement

Australia is concerned about the impact of Chinese police on unity of command in security operations, he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“In such a fragile, volatile country Chinese policing techniques and tactics that we’ve seen deployed so ruthlessly in Hong Kong, for example, are completely inconsistent with the Pacific way of resolving issues and could incite further instability and violence in the Solomon Islands,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Chinese embassy in the Solomon Islands did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China said previously the security deal was not targeted at any third party and did not contradict the cooperation the Pacific nation has with other countries.

The pact has dominated the Australian election campaign, amid fears it could lead to a Chinese navy presence less than 2,000km (1,200 miles) from Australia.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Wednesday, Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews told radio station 4BC it was “very likely” China would send troops to Solomons, and said the timing of the pact announcement was a form of political interference in the Australian election.

China’s foreign ministry told reporters a day earlier that “Australian politicians often seek selfish political gains by making wild remarks to smear China and clamour for war”.

Shearer denied the signing of the pact was an intelligence failure by Australia, which has invested billions of dollars in aid and security assistance to the Solomon islands.

Intelligence agencies were concerned it could potentially lead to an increased Chinese military presence, despite Sogavare publicly ruling this out, he said.

China aimed to establish a network of dual use and military facilities from the west coast of Africa to the Pacific, he said.

RELATED STORIES

New Zealand’s Ardern says Solomon Islands-China deal ‘gravely concerning’

To counter China influence, US names envoy to lead Pacific Island talks

U.S. vows stepped up Indo-Pacific effort in push back against China

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Blinken with Pacific trip aims to reaffirm US focus on Asia

TAGS: Australia, China, Hong Kong, Security

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.