UK 'always' Prince Harry's home, security case hears | Inquirer News

UK ‘always’ Prince Harry’s home, security case hears

/ 11:46 AM February 20, 2022

Co-Chair Britain's Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, gestures as he speaks onstage during the taping of the "Vax Live" fundraising concert at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, on May 2, 2021. - The fundraising concert "Vax Live: The Concert To Reunite The World", put on by international advocacy organization Global Citizen, is pushing businesses to "donate dollars for doses," and for G7 governments to share excess vaccines. The concert will be pre-taped on May 2 in Los Angeles, and will stream on YouTube along with American television networks ABC and CBS on May 8. (Photo by VALERIE MACON / AFP)

Co-Chair Britain’s Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, gestures as he speaks onstage during the taping of the “Vax Live” fundraising concert at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, on May 2, 2021. AFP FILE PHOTO

LONDON — A lawyer for Prince Harry told a London court Friday that the UK “will always be his home”, appealing a government refusal to provide the British royal with police protection even if he pays for it.

Harry and wife Meghan lost their UK taxpayer-paid protection when they quit frontline royal duties in 2020 and moved to California.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Duke of Sussex, who was not in court, is seeking a judicial review after the interior ministry declined his request to pay himself for UK police protection.

FEATURED STORIES

The couple have their own private security team in the US but Harry says that they do not have adequate jurisdiction or access to UK intelligence necessary to keep his family safe.

“This claim is about the fact that the claimant does not feel safe when he is in the UK,” Harry’s lawyer Shaheed Fatima told the Royal Courts of Justice.

“It goes without saying that he does want to come back to see family and friends and to continue to support the charities that are so close to his heart.

“Most of all, this is and always will be his home.”

Last summer, Harry’s car was chased by paparazzi photographers as he left a charity event in London. The next day, he and elder brother William unveiled a statue of their late mother, Princess Diana.

She died in Paris in 1997 after a high-speed car chase also involving photographers, and Harry’s relations with the UK media remain fraught.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Home Office’s lawyer Robert Palmer dismissed Harry’s offer to pay for police protection as “irrelevant”.

“Personal protective security by the police is not available on a privately financed basis,” Palmer said in a written submission.

Instead, the government’s “Royal and VIP Executive Committee” (RAVEC) decides on whether to provide Harry with police protection depending on the reason for his presence in the UK.

“A case-by-case approach rationally and appropriately allows RAVEC to implement a responsive approach to reflect the applicable circumstances,” Palmer said.

RELATED STORIES

UK’s Prince Harry seeks right to pay for UK police protection

No holds barred: Meghan and Harry’s historic interview

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Meghan says UK royals refused to make her son a prince due to skin color concerns

TAGS: Police, Prince Harry, Royals

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.