Lacson '1,000% sure' Duterte wasn't referring to him about aspirant using cocaine | Inquirer News

Lacson ‘1,000% sure’ Duterte wasn’t referring to him about aspirant using cocaine

/ 07:59 PM November 19, 2021

Senator Panfilo Lacson said he is “1,000%” certain President Rodrigo Duterte was not referring to him when he accused a presidential aspirant of being a cocaine user.

Senator Panfilo “Ping” Lacson. INQUIRER file photo / EDWIN BACASMAS

MANILA, Philippines — Senator Panfilo Lacson said he is “1,000%” certain President Rodrigo Duterte was not referring to him when he accused a presidential aspirant of being a cocaine user.

“Except to say, I am 1,000% sure he was not referring to me, I have no further comment,” Lacson said in a message to reporters when sought for comment on Duterte’s claims against a presidential bet.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a previous statement in October, Lacson also expressed willingness to undergo a drug test.

FEATURED STORIES

“I have never been addicted to drugs all my life, so I have no problem with that. In fact, we should all undergo random testing to make it more credible. I understand drug toxins may dissipate after 72 hours,” the senator had said.

On Thursday night, Duterte accused a presidential aspirant of using cocaine.

While he did not give the person’s name, Duterte hinted that the aspirant comes from a well-known and rich clan, whose family name means “strong” and is known for its patriarch.

Other presidential bets have likewise said they are willing to be drug tested.

RELATED STORY:

After Duterte revelation, Moreno wants all presidential aspirants to undergo drug test

ADVERTISEMENT

If elected, Pacquiao to impose mandatory drug testing for gov’t officials

JPV
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: 2022 polls, Cocaine, Nation, News, Rodrigo Duterte

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.