Prosecution welcomes Senate ruling on De Lima’s testimony | Inquirer News
SAYING HEARSAYS ARE ADMISSIBLE IN IMPEACH COURT

Prosecution welcomes Senate ruling on De Lima’s testimony

/ 01:22 AM February 24, 2012

MANILA, Philippines—The prosecution team welcomed the ruling of the Senate, acting as an impeachment court, in allowing the hearsay-testimony of Justice Secretary Leila de Lima to stand.

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile on Thursday ruled that De Lima’s testimony based on Associate Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno’s dissenting opinion on the Supreme Court’s Nov. 15, 2011 temporary restraining order (TRO) was hearsay but it was allowed to remain on record.

“Today’s ruling is absolutely welcome, very enlightening for us, it’s a very, very welcome afternoon for us,” said Marikina Representative Romero Quimbo in a press briefing.

Article continues after this advertisement

Quimbo insisted that the impeachment proceeding is different from a criminal proceeding. He added that US jurisprudence allows hearsay evidence to be admitted in impeachment cases.

FEATURED STORIES

“Based on US jurisprudence, which is what we’ve always been saying, is that the quantum of evidence is not proof beyond reasonable doubt. In fact it is just any proof which any of the judges are willing to accept to support a verdict of conviction or acquittal,” Quimbo said.

“It is entirely up to the senator to make that decision. There is no quantum of evidence that is actually required or set.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Hearsays are actually admissible in terms of impeachment cases,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Quimbo added the prosecution is left with no choice but to use hearsay testimonies since the Supreme Court has made it difficult for them to present evidence and witnesses through their issuance of rulings like the temporary restraining order that barred the prosecution from opening foreign accounts of Corona and the February 14 ruling which disallowed SC justices from testifying and even volunteering to testify without the consent of the en banc.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Literally, the SC has placed a field, a wall around it that makes truth seeking impenetrable,” Quimbo said.

Originally posted at 06:58 pm | Thursday, February 23,  2012

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Corona prosecution team

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.