Duterte should refrain from defending 'friends' in Pharmally probe -- ally senator | Inquirer News

Duterte should refrain from defending ‘friends’ in Pharmally probe — ally senator

/ 10:54 AM September 29, 2021

Sen. Francis “Tol” Tolentino

Sen. Francis “Tol” Tolentino during one of the Senate’s hybrid plenary sessions. Senate PRIB file photo / Voltaire F. Domingo

MANILA, Philippines — President Rodrigo Duterte should refrain from defending his “friends” tagged in the multi-billion government contracts with Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corp. and let the investigation proceed, Senator Francis Tolentino said Wednesday.

Tolentino, however, was quick to say that Duterte’s defense of his people should not be considered as a “tolerance of corruption” but “a measure of what friendship is.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“That’s his personal choice [to defend his people] but if given a chance to advise I would probably tell him that he already made his point just let the investigation proceed and he can probably refrain from defending persons he could probably term as friends,” the senator said in an interview on ABS-CBN News Channel.

FEATURED STORIES

“But his defense should not be considered as a tolerance of corruption. His defense here should not be considered an unyielding or a stubborn response to an investigation but a measure of what friendship is,” Tolentino added.

Senators are looking into the government’s transactions with Pharmally, which was awarded over P8.6 billion worth of supply contracts for medical supplies in 2020 despite being only several months old and having just P625,000 in paid-up capital.

Article continues after this advertisement

Since the start of the investigation, led by Senator Richard Gordon’s blue ribbon committee, senators have been at the receiving end of tirades coming from the President.

Article continues after this advertisement

Duterte, at one point, surmised politics may be behind the investigation, which senators have denied.

Article continues after this advertisement

Malacañang, for its part, said the President is trying to find fault in senators investigating the government’s purchase of allegedly overpriced medical supplies to protect “innocent” government officials.

But Tolentino, an ally of the President in the Senate, cited the separation of powers, saying both the executive  and legislative branches of government should respect one another.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I think these are personal statements but if we look at separation of powers I think the respect due to the Senate must be accorded, the same is true with the presidency itself must be respected,” he said.

“But one thing that struck my attention was that the President is used to defending people close to him, his friends. So this is human nature,” Tolentino added.

Meanwhile, Tolentino, who described himself as a “keen observer” of the Senate probe, said he is focusing on what legislation should be crafted to address procurement issues uncovered during the hearings.

“I’m more desirous of producing the required legislation here,” he said.

Among these bills include the amendment of the existing powers of the Government Procurement Policy Board “to frequently revise” their implementing rules and regulations.

Tolentino also pushed for the passage of a bill he filed seeking to institutionalize the “Filipino First” policy in the government procurement system.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“It’s important not just for that particular issue but even post-pandemic that we should encourage Filipino products,” he noted.

JPV
TAGS: Nation, News, Pharmally, Rodrigo Duterte, Senate probe

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.