Olongapo court refuses to overturn acquittal of 2 Aetas in anti-terror test case | Inquirer News

Olongapo court refuses to overturn acquittal of 2 Aetas in anti-terror test case

/ 06:51 PM August 04, 2021
Japer Gurung (right) and Junior Ramos speak during a press briefing organized by the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict at the BJMP facility in Olongapo City. (Photo by Joanna Rose Aglibot)

FILE – Japer Gurung (right) and Junior Ramos speak during a press briefing organized by the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict at the BJMP facility in Olongapo City. (Photo by Joanna Rose Aglibot)

MANILA, Philippines—The Olongapo Regional Trial Court has refused to reverse the acquittal of two Aetas, the first to be charged for violating the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

In a two-page order, Olongapo Regional Trial Court Presiding Judge Melani Fay Tadili denied the motion for reconsideration filed by the prosecution.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The prosecution’s Motion for Reconsideration is denied for lack of merit,” read the court’s order.

Last month, the Olongapo Court granted the demurrer to evidence filed by the Public Attorneys’ Office (PAO) on behalf of Japer Gurung and Junior Ramos, saying the evidence presented by the prosecution is weak.

FEATURED STORIES

The court granted the demurrer causing the acquittal of the two. The two have already been released from detention.

In its recent order, the court said “the grant of accused’ demurrer to evidence operates as an acquittal and thus, reconsideration of the same will subject them to double jeopardy.”

Double jeopardy means that a person cannot be charged with the same offense twice. It is prohibited under the 1987 Constitution.

The court also reminded the prosecution that modification of judgment may be made on motion of the accused on a judgment of conviction under Section 7 Rule 120 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Gurung and Ramos were the first to be charged for violating Republic Act 11479 or the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020. They were accused of being a member of the New People’s Army (NPA) who engaged in a firefight with the military on August 2020 leading to the death of one soldier.

The two denied the allegation saying they were merely trying to get away from the firefight with their families when they were arrested. While in detention, Gurung said they were tortured to admit they were members of the NPA to which the military denied.

The court, in its July 2021 ruling said the prosecution failed to provide enough evidence that the two violated the Anti-Terror Law.

ADVERTISEMENT

It noted the inconsistencies of witnesses including soldiers who failed to positively identify the two.

RELATED STORIES

Olongapo court acquits 2 Aetas in first Anti-Terror Law case

Anti-Terror Law’s first hit: Two Aetas from Zambales – group

Tortured’ Aetas seek SC help against anti-terror law

Why the 2 Aetas quit joining the anti-terror law challengers

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Aeta, Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2023 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.