NTF-Elcac: Comparing ATC reso to red-tagging waters down gravity of terrorism | Inquirer News

NTF-Elcac: Comparing ATC reso to red-tagging waters down gravity of terrorism

By: - Reporter / @zacariansINQ
/ 05:38 PM May 17, 2021

NTF-Elcac

(FILE PHOTO) BADOY PRESENTS FORMER REBELS: National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) Spokesperson Lorraine Badoy, during the Committee on National Defense and Security, Peace, Unification and Reconciliation hearing on the issue of red-tagging /red-baiting of certain celebrities, personalities, institutions, and organizations Tuesday, November 24, 2020, presents before the panel self-proclaimed former rebels who joined the government’s anti-terrorism campaign. (Henzberg Austria/Senate PRIB)

MANILA, Philippines — The National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-Elcac) on Monday dismissed comparisons between “red-tagging” and the Anti-Terrorists Council’s (ATC) designation of 29 individuals as “terrorists,” saying that it “waters down” the gravity of terrorism.

“When you say it’s red-tag, winater-down niya eh, ‘yung (it waters down the) gravity of the offense,” newly-appointed spokesperson of the NTF-Elcac and director of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples Cordillera, Marlon Bosantog, said in a press briefing on Monday.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We’re talking about terrorism in itself, its boundaries transcends ideologies,” he added.

FEATURED STORIES

This came after the ATC identified 19 alleged leaders of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and the New People’s Army (NPA), along with another 10 alleged members of the Abu Sayyaf Group as “terrorists,” without providing any supporting proof on May 13.

Bosantog explained that designation is different to “red-tagging” because it is “very specific.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“It does not [just] pertain to ideological perception or being a part of an ideological society, but it’s more of the actions,” said Bosantog.

Article continues after this advertisement

Bosantog further explained that the designation was done under the premise of due process given that the ATC was passed by Congress, and that the designees have remedies available to them.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Kahit nga yung decision ng ATC [even the decision of ATC], can actually be questioned before the Supreme Court,” Bosantag said.

“Because the Supreme Court has overarching power when it comes to actions by the executive department. So they can actually review the actions of the ATC,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Meanwhile, in the same press briefing, NTF-Elcac spokesperson for social media affairs Lorraine Marie Badoy reiterated that there is no such thing as “red-tagging” under the Philippine law.

“In fact red-tagging is an invention of the CPP-NPA-NDF [Communist Part of the Philippines-New People’s Army-National Democratic Front] that they use to silence those who speak the truth about them,” she said.

Badoy’s claim, however, has already been debunked by Rappler’s fact-checking team on January 12, 2021.

According to the online news portal, the term has already been used in journals and newspapers even before the CPP was founded in 1968.

The CPP itself has also already slammed the designation, saying that the resolutions are clear signs that the the Anti-Terrorism Law is being used as an “oppressive weapon used by tyrants to perpetuate their rule.”

RELATED STORIES:

‘Red-tagging at its finest’ 

Tagging individuals as ‘terrorists’ without evidence is rights violation — Bayan 

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

ATC’s terrorist tagging is ‘arbitrary,’ no factual basis — NDFP consultant 

JPV
TAGS: NTF-ELCAC, red-tagging, Terrorism

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.