Palace ‘like a headless chicken’ on West Philippine Sea issue – Carpio | Inquirer News
CONFLICTING POSITIONS

Palace ‘like a headless chicken’ on West Philippine Sea issue – Carpio

MANILA, Philippines — Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio on Saturday scored presidential spokesperson Harry Roque Jr. for denying the verbal fishing agreement that President Rodrigo Duterte admitted to have forged with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

“The Palace is running like a headless chicken when it comes to the West Philippine Sea (WPS) [issue],” Carpio told the Inquirer.

“The Palace has conflicting positions on the fishing agreement. Changing positions confuse all our people, supporters and allies. The adversary will exploit such confusion,” he warned.

Article continues after this advertisement

Roque on Friday dismissed as “conjecture” Mr. Duterte’s own admission that he entered into a “verbal fishing agreement” with Xi in 2016 that opened the Philippine waters to Chinese fishermen.“There is no truth to the speculation of a purported ‘verbal fishing agreement’ between President Rodrigo Roa Duterte and President Xi Jinping,” Roque said in a statement.

FEATURED STORIES

But the President himself spent several minutes during his 2019 State of the Nation Address talking about the agreement.

Salvador Panelo, the chief legal counsel, even said that “even if it’s verbal, it’s valid and binding as long as there is mutual consent from the two parties.”

Article continues after this advertisement

But Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. admitted in 2019 that the President may have entered into that agreement in personal talks with Xi in 2016, but doubted its legality because it was just a verbal agreement.

Article continues after this advertisement

“[But] the verbal agreement cannot be enforced. It cannot be enforced on us because it’s verbal,” Locsin said in a televised interview in 2019. “It’s not policy.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Opposition Sen. Franklin Drilon agreed and reiterated on Saturday that such verbal agreement was illegal because he cannot give away fishing rights enshrined in the Constitution nor enter into treaties without the ratification of the Senate.

“If it is a verbal agreement, that should not be complied with as it is void. Agreements between countries must be in written form, in treaties, which need to be ratified by the Senate,” he said.Drilon said the Philippines’ position on the WPS had been compromised by the Duterte government’s wavering stand, based on a supposed “appeasement and accommodation policy” on China.“China will continue to ignore us because of the Philippine government’s appeasement and accommodation policy. We have won a case in the International Tribunal, which said that China’s claim has no basis, but they have been taking it for granted,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

While the agreement may be void from the start, Carpio said it was precisely what emboldened the Chinese fishermen to repeatedly intrude into Philippine territorial waters.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Rodrigo Duterte

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.