Senate allows testimony of PS Bank exec in Corona trial | Inquirer News

Senate allows testimony of PS Bank exec in Corona trial

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 04:52 PM February 08, 2012

MANILA, Philippines – A representative of the Philippine Savings Bank has been allowed to testify at the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona despite pending petitions filed against it before the Supreme Court.

Pascual Garcia III, president of PSBank branch in Katipunan, Quezon City, took the witness stand on Wednesday despite objection raised by Corona’s lead counsel, former Supreme Court Justice Serafin Cuevas.

“The issue relative to these bank deposits is now under question your honor. With apology and with indulgence of this honorable court, we went on certiorari before the Supreme Court raising this particular matter as an issue on our claim for grave abuse of discretion ..” said Cuevas when chief prosecutor, Iloilo Representative Niel Tupas III called the witness.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If this witness will be allowed to testify now, we are worried that our petition maybe rendered moot and academic. So out of respect for the Supreme Court your honor, we beg most respectfully that this be deferred even up to Tuesday your honor,” he said.

FEATURED STORIES

Senate President Juan Ponce-Enrile initially acceded to Cuevas’ request but Tupas insisted that their witness be allowed to testify in the trial.

At this point, Enrile said, “We can’t stop the process with due respect to the Supreme Court. We are mandated to try and decide this.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The language of the Constitution is to shall forthwith proceed with the trial and decisions of this case. Now you’re free to state your objections or any questions against the presentation of these witnesses but we will allow the presentation of the witnesses who are here now,” said Enrile.

Article continues after this advertisement

He admitted though that he was in a quandary because at the moment, there was no order from any authority to stop the proceeding.

In the end, Enrile ruled that, “In the absence of the temporary restraining order from the Supreme Court, the chair rules that we must proceed with the trial.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: PS Bank

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.