Hong Kong clinic punished for recommending foreign vaccine over Chinese jab | Inquirer News
Close  

Hong Kong clinic punished for recommending foreign vaccine over Chinese jab

/ 06:28 PM March 24, 2021
Hong Kong clinic punished for recommending foreign vaccine over Chinese jab

This is a combination photo of Pfizer/BioNTech (left) and Sinovac vaccines. INQUIRER FILES

Hong Kong, China Hong Kong health authorities have ejected a private clinic from the city’s coronavirus vaccination program after it reportedly recommended the German-made Pfizer/BioNTech shot to patients over the one from China’s Sinovac.

The move illustrates the Hong Kong government’s sensitivity to any criticism of the Sinovac vaccine, which has a comparatively lower efficacy rate and was fast-tracked by regulators despite a lack of published data.

ADVERTISEMENT

The city’s health department said Tuesday that the clinic would no longer administer COVID-19 jabs because a doctor violated an agreement with the inoculation program.

Authorities said they had also reclaimed unused Sinovac doses from the clinic.

FEATURED STORIES

The announcement came after a photo of a notice at the clinic comparing the two vaccines’ efficacy rates went viral online over the weekend.

“Advice: don’t take Sinovac, take BioNTech,” the notice read, adding one of the clinic’s own doctors had chosen the latter.

Ta Kung Pao, a newspaper that answers to Beijing’s Liaison Office in Hong Kong, then ran a report accusing the doctor of “smearing” the Sinovac vaccine.

So far some 403,000 Hong Kongers — about five percent of the city’s population — have received their first doses.

More than 250,000 of them got the Sinovac jab, while the rest got Pfizer-BioNTech shots.

Separately on Wednesday, the government suspended the Pfizer shot due to a packaging problem but stressed it did not believe there was a safety risk.

Limited data

China’s coronavirus vaccine makers have been less forthcoming than their competitors in publishing peer-reviewed data from clinical trials — even as Beijing pushes those shots around the world as an alternative to Western-made shots.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Sinovac shot was approved by Hong Kong after the company submitted data directly to regulators, not to a peer-reviewed medical journal.

Data on the jab from trials in other countries point to the efficacy of between 50-80 percent, depending on the studies, compared with Pfizer/BioNTech’s 94-95 percent.

Hong Kong began its vaccination drive last month but the public take-up has been slow and ensnared by roiling distrust of China, fuelled by Beijing’s sweeping crackdown on the city’s democracy movement.

A recent poll said only 37 percent of adults planned to get vaccinated.

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam has previously lamented the tepid enthusiasm for vaccination and accused critics of “smearing” China’s vaccines.

However, some of the city’s own leading epidemiologists have openly stated that the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine is measurably more effective.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link .

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: China, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Health, Hongkong, pandemic, Pfizer-BioNTech, Politics, SARS-CoV-2, Sinovac, vaccine, Virus
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2021 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.