'Severe provocation': Hontiveros slams presence of 220 China vessels in WPS | Inquirer News
‘Respeto na lang sana’

‘Severe provocation’: Hontiveros slams presence of 220 China vessels in WPS

/ 11:51 AM March 22, 2021

FILE PHOTO: A Chinese fisheries surveillance vessel (rear) cruises next to a Japan Coast Guard patrol ship in the waters about 24 km (14.9 miles) north-northwest of Kuba island, one of the disputed islands in the East China Sea, known as the Senkaku isles in Japan, Diaoyu islands in China, in this handout photo by Japan Coast Guard's 11th Regional Coast Guard headquarters September 18, 2012

FILE PHOTO: Around 220 Chinese militia vessels were spotted moored at Julian Felipe Reef in the West Philippine Sea last March 7, 2021. (NTF WPS). REUTERS/11th Regional Coast Guard Headquarters-Japan Coast Guard/Handout

MANILA, Philippines — A displeased Senator Risa Hontiveros on Monday slammed the presence of 220 Chinese militia vessels in the West Philippine Sea, calling this latest incursion as a “severe provocation” on the part of China.

The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) earlier reported that 220 Chinese vessels believed to be “manned by Chinese maritime militia personnel” were spotted at the Julian Felipe Reef in the West Philippine Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

Hontiveros said such acts of China came at a time when the country is grappling with the surge in COVID-19 pandemic.

FEATURED STORIES

“Habang nagkakandarapa pa tayo sa pagtaas ng mga kaso ng COVID-19 sa bansa, ang Tsina naman walang pakundangan ang pagsulong sa ating karagatan. (While we are having a hard time amid the rise of COVID-19 cases, China continues to go to our waters.),” she said in a statement.

“Not aggravating the tensions in our seas is the absolute least China could have done in the middle of a global pandemic. Respeto nalang sana, hindi pa maipakita. (They could have at least showed respect, yet still failed to do that),” she added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Hontiveros likewise said that the presence of the Chinese vessels in Philippine territory does not build peace or stability in the region.

Article continues after this advertisement

Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. said the Philippines has sent a diplomatic protest to China over its latest incursion in the WPS.

Article continues after this advertisement

Hontiveros backed the filing of the protest, citing the environmental damage and the natural resources that could be further lost due to the presence of the vessels in the Julian Felipe Reef, which is within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf.

“We have exclusive rights over the resources — fish, oil, and natural gas — in Julian Felipe Reef. Atin lang dapat iyan pero pilit na naman nang-aagaw ang Tsina ng mga bagay na hindi kanila. Nakakagalit. It’s maddening how China continues to snatch away our nation’s wealth while we’re in the depths of an economic crisis,” Hontiveros said.

Article continues after this advertisement

In February 2021, Hontiveros calculated that China now owes Filipinos over P800 billion in marine damage and losses due to its adventurism in the WPS.

In April of the same year, the senator also filed Senate Resolution No. 369 demanding that China pay ₱200 billion worth of reparations, which could be used in the country’s fight against COVID-19.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“China really has no plans of recognizing and respecting the 2016 Hague ruling that favors our country. Hindi na nakakatuwa ang patuloy na panggagahasa ng ating likas-yaman. Mag-ipon na ang Tsina kasi magbabayad sila,” Hontiveros said. – Liezelle Soriano Roy, Trainee

EDV
TAGS: China

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.