2 tech firms cleared of ‘TouchPay’ complaints | Inquirer News

2 tech firms cleared of ‘TouchPay’ complaints

By: - Reporter / @KAguilarINQ
/ 06:35 PM February 07, 2021

MANILA, Philippines — The Manila City Prosecutor’s Office has dismissed complaints of utility model infringement and unfair competition filed by Manila Express Payment Systems (MEPS) against two technology companies for insufficient evidence.

MEPS, operator of the “TouchPay” electronic collection system, had alleged that BTI Payments Philippines and Electronic Transfer Advance Processing, Inc. (eTAP) unlawfully copied its automated payment machine.

“Upon evaluation, the evidence adduced has not sufficiently or substantially established that the public or end consumers were confused as to the machines they were utilizing in their transactions,” the resolution of the Manila City Prosecutor’s Office read.

Article continues after this advertisement

“There is also no evidence showing that when the confiscated machines were operated, such indeed showed or exhibited an imitation of the utility model flow of that of [TouchPay],” it added.

FEATURED STORIES

In a statement, TouchPay said it has been “aggressive at cracking down on alleged “fake” machines and has been filing cases against other competing payment kiosk providers” via the National Bureau of Investigation’s intellectual property rights division.

TouchPay is an automated payment machine that offers electronic transactions for paying utility bills, prepaid loads, and more.

/MUF
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: eTAP, INC, Touchpay

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.