Prosecution defends request for appearance of PAL execs in impeach trial | Inquirer News

Prosecution defends request for appearance of PAL execs in impeach trial

/ 07:15 PM February 02, 2012

MANILA, Philippines – The prosecution defended its request before the Senate, acting as an impeachment court, for the appearance of two Philippine Airlines officials who were expected to shed light on the alleged special privileges given to Chief Justice Renato Corona despite a pending case lodged before the Supreme Court against PAL.

Speaking to reporters, Marikina Representative Miro Quimbo, spokesman for the prosecution, said that their request was based on Article 3, which accused the chief magistrate of failing to maintain his competence, integrity, probity and independence in his alleged involvement with the case filed by the Flight Attendants and Stewards Association of the Philippines (FASAP) against PAL.

“The theory is that the chief justice’s competence, integrity, probity and independence has been compromised by privileges that were given by PAL, particularly at the time when Supreme Court was deciding on cases involving PAL.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“We have evidence which would explain how the chief justice and his family received benefits from PAL,” the spokesman said in Filipino. Adding that they wanted to raise the issue in the trial not only because Corona allegedly received benefits and gifts from PAL but because these supposed benefits were given to him at the time the FASAP case was being heard by the Supreme Court.

FEATURED STORIES

“[This was done] despite the fact that PAL participated and accepted the jurisdiction of the decisions… pero biglang-bigla po ex parte ay binaligtad po ito en banc in an administrative circular. The chief justice is the administrative head and we deem him as the number one person when it comes to this particular decision.”

Quimbo further explained that PAL’s records and the alleged platinum cards of the Corona couple “will show their different travels [and] would prove and validate the initial info we have. But like I said, we will let the prosecutors establish that link.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Prosecution, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.