House opposes planned liberalization of sugar importation | Inquirer News

House opposes planned liberalization of sugar importation

/ 05:54 PM November 16, 2020

Workers harvest sugarcane in the fields of Bukidnon province where 16 percent of the country’s sugar requirement are produced. Photo by Jessie Amigleo

MANILA, Philippines — The House of Representatives adopted Monday a resolution expressing “strong opposition” to the planned liberalization or deregulation of the importation of sugar in the country.

In its first plenary session following a month-long break, lawmakers adopted House Resolution No. 1242, citing the threat that the sugar importation liberalization poses to sugar farmers and mill workers.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the resolution, the unregulated entry of subsidized imported sugar will be “disastrous” to the domestic sugar industry which contributes around P96 billion to the gross domestic product.

The move, the resolution stated, will also affect 84,000 sugar farmers and 720,000 industry workers in the country.

FEATURED STORIES

“The liberalization or deregulation of sugar importation undermines President Rodrigo Duterte’s vision of inclusive growth for the country as it will be detrimental to farmers, farm workers and their families, and the rural communities that produce sugar,” the resolution stated.

In September 2019, the Department of Finance issued an economic bulletin announcing the removal of quantitative restrictions on sugar imports in a move to improve the competitiveness of the industry.

However, the resolution noted that major sugar exporting countries such as Thailand and India can sell their excess sugar at below cost of production because they provide “massive subsidies and other forms of protection such as domestic and export support prices to their farmers and industries.”

“(W)hile Filipino sugar farmers, most of whom are small farmers and agrarian reform beneficiaries, get minimal support and cannot afford to sell their sugar below costs,” the resolution stated.

“Even the United States of America, which is the champion of globalization and liberalization, has a long-standing policy to strictly regulate sugar importation to shield its farmers from the price distortions in the world market for sugar,” it added.

The resolution likewise pointed out that the deregulation of sugar importation will not affect the competitiveness of food products for export which contain sugar because they can already import sugar without the value added tax or customs duties provided that the end-product is exported and not sold locally.

“Sugar farmers point out that notwithstanding the drop in mill site prices of sugar, retail prices remain high, and in some supermarkets well-above the suggested retail price, indicating that while traders and importers will benefit from liberalization or deregulation of sugar importation, consumers will not,” the resolution stated.

“Philippine sugar had long ago lost its market abroad and the larger part of sugar production in the country has been redirected towards the domestic market which is now being threatened by the planned liberalization,” it added.

EDV
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: quantitative restrictions, sugar imports, sugar liberalization, sugar production
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2023 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.