Close  

CHR focusing probes on gov’t? Our mandate is to watch those in power, says commission

/ 12:52 AM October 02, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — Since President Rodrigo Duterte assumed office in 2016, the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) has been vocal about its concerns about possible rights violations in the law enforcement agencies’ conduct of the drug war.

CHR’s observations however were not taken lightly by administration supporters who have asked why the commission does not react to instances when state enforcers are the ones placed in danger during anti-drug operations.  Some also questioned why CHR was not as vocal during the past administration as it is now.

ADVERTISEMENT

But for CHR, this is just its role; Spokesperson Jacqueline de Guia explained on Wednesday that their primary mandate is to monitor, observe, and watch over the state actors, and not those from the private sector.

“We have always stood for the respect and protection of the human rights and dignity of all. As such, we equally believe in making sure that all perpetrators of human rights abuses and violations should be made accountable for their offenses.

FEATURED STORIES

“CHR has repeatedly stressed, however, that the respect, protection, and fulfillment of human rights remains to be a primary obligation of the government,” De Guia said in a statement.

“CHR’s mandate is to be a watchdog, monitor, advocate, and educator of the government with respect to human rights. And just as the government has the primary obligation for our human rights, CHR primarily investigates State agents and representatives should they incur lapses and violations in their responsibilities,” she added.

De Guia’s statements were in response to Sagip party-list Rep. Rodante Marcoleta’s latest call for CHR to investigate all forms of human rights violations, including those not involving government officers and officials.

This is not the first time Marcoleta insisted that the commission should investigate rights violations done by terrorists, moving to give the constitutional office a measly P1,000 budget in 2017.  Marcoleta back then also said that CHR was not a valid agency, despite the 1987 Constitution creating it.

READ: House gives Commission on Human Rights P1,000 budget for 2018

De Guia answered Marcoleta’s call, saying that despite focusing on government, there were occasions when the commission probed violations committed by private individuals, especially if the victims were part of a sector vulnerable to abuses.

There were also times when the commission heaped praises on government officers and criticized its perceived enemies, including communist rebels, which are usually associated with CHR.

ADVERTISEMENT

Recently, supporters of the government were surprised to see CHR condemning actions by the New People’s Army, which was accused of using girls as sex slaves.  But some netizens were also quick to question why CHR still passed the buck to the government to arrest the perpetrators.

READ: CHR slams NPA for alleged rape of minors, asks gov’t to resolve issue

“Even when CHR investigates, it is still upon the government to ensure that these incidences of human rights abuses and violations are pursued in the interest of administering justice for and on behalf of the victims from wrongful acts perpetrated by non-State actors,” De Guia explained.

“It is in this view that we agree with Congressman Marcoleta—all human rights violations should be investigated.  But with respect to the wisdom of the Constitution, CHR is not a law enforcement agency. This is also the marginal note contained in the said infographic,” she added.

CHR has also received various accusations of being biased against President Duterte and biased toward the past administration, as several human rights incidents before the President’s term were supposedly not investigated.

However, it stressed that even past administrations of the commission had probed accusations before, like the violent dispersal of Kidapawan farmers in 2016.

“CHR issued a report in their probe regarding the incident, recommending the filing of criminal, civil and administrative charges against local government officials, law enforcement personnel, inquest prosecutors and protest organizers in connection with the violent dispersal of a farmers’ protest in Kidapawan City on April 1,” CHR noted in a Facebook post.

The Commission on Human Rights has recently been made aware of efforts by individuals to spread misleading information…

Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines 發佈於 2020年9月30日 星期三

JE
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: 2021 budget, administration critic, CHR, Commission on Human Rights, Drug war, Human rights, human rights violations, Philippine news updates, President Rodrigo Duterte, Rep. Rodante Marcoleta, Spokesperson Jacqueline de Guia
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.