Ombudsman orders murder case filed vs ex-mayor | Inquirer News

Ombudsman orders murder case filed vs ex-mayor

/ 01:06 AM January 19, 2012

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales has ordered the filing of murder charges against former Gapan Mayor Ernesto Natividad and two others for the killing of Ericson and Ebertson Pascual in a Nueva Ecija cockpit in 2006.

Also ordered charged were Romeo Natividad and Ricardo Peralta. In directing the filing of charges against the three men, Morales reversed a 2009 ruling of the Office of the Ombudsman that had excluded them from the murder case filed earlier against six other individuals for the Pascuals’ killing.

The killings were allegedly motivated by politics.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Department of Justice (DOJ) initially ordered the filing of murder charges against the suspects in 2009, and the case was forwarded to the Office of the Ombudsman for review because a public official was involved.

FEATURED STORIES

The Office of the Ombudsman affirmed the DOJ ruling on Feb. 10, 2009, but later reversed this in an April 8, 2009, order and excluded the Natividads and Peralta from the murder case based on their motions for reconsideration.

In her Dec. 19 order, Morales granted the motion for reconsideration of the Pascuals’ mother, Cristina, and said that in the first place, the Office of the Ombudsman should not have reversed its Feb. 10 ruling that had affirmed the findings of the DOJ.

Article continues after this advertisement

She also said based on the statements of credible witnesses, there was probable cause to file the murder charges against the Natividads and Peralta.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to the Ombudsman, the DOJ ruling should have been affirmed outright because the Natividads and Peralta filed their motions for reconsideration too late. She said they only had five days to file the motion and this period lapsed before they could submit their appeal.

Article continues after this advertisement

Since the motions for reconsideration were filed late, the Office of the Ombudsman’s Feb. 10 ruling affirming the DOJ’s findings had become final and executory.

Morales also said that even if the motions for reconsideration were filed on time, the Office of the Ombudsman should not have granted these.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.