China to foreign critics: Hong Kong law 'none of your business' | Inquirer News

China to foreign critics: Hong Kong law ‘none of your business’

/ 05:29 PM July 01, 2020

Zhang Xiaoming, executive deputy director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs office of the State Council, speaks to journalists at the end of a press conference about the new Hong Kong national security law in Beijing on July 1, 2020. - Hong Kong marks the 23rd anniversary of its handover to China on July 1 under the glare of a new national security law imposed by Beijing, with protests banned and the city's cherished freedoms looking increasingly fragile. (Photo by GREG BAKER / AFP)

Zhang Xiaoming, executive deputy director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs office of the State Council, speaks to journalists at the end of a press conference about the new Hong Kong national security law in Beijing on July 1, 2020. (Photo by GREG BAKER / AFP)

BEIJING — China on Wednesday slammed international criticism over a controversial new national security law for Hong Kong, saying other countries should keep quiet.

Western governments and critics have warned the new law will curb the city’s autonomy and undermine the “One Country, Two Systems” policy meant to protect freedoms unseen on the mainland.

Article continues after this advertisement

But Beijing officials have rebuffed the criticism.

FEATURED STORIES

“What’s this got to do with you?” said Zhang Xiaoming of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office of the State Council at a press conference. “It’s none of your business”.

Officials insisted there had been wide consultation with members of Hong Kong society and hit back at claims it was undermining Hong Kong’s autonomy.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If what we want is one country, one system, it would have been simple,” Zhang said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We are completely able to impose the criminal law, the criminal procedure and the national security law and other national laws on Hong Kong.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Why would we need to put so much effort into formulating a national security law tailor-made for Hong Kong?”

Zhang also insisted that the law — which he said cannot be applied retrospectively — was only to target “a handful of criminals” and “not the entire opposition camp.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The purpose of enacting Hong Kong’s national security law is definitely not to target Hong Kong’s opposition camp, pro-democracy camp, as the enemy,” he said.

Instead, the One Country, Two Systems policy showed the government’s “political tolerance”, he said.

His comments come a day after Hong Kong pro-democracy party Demosisto announced it was disbanding, following the passing of the law.

Zhang also lashed out at suggestions of punishment from other nations.

“As for… some countries now saying that they will impose severe sanctions on some Chinese officials, I think this is the logic of bandits.”

A group of 27 countries including Britain, France, Germany and Japan, made a rare oral rebuke of China at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on Tuesday and urged Beijing to reconsider the law.

Foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said in a separate briefing that 53 countries had made a joint statement at the council to “support China’s policy on Hong Kong.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“A minority of Western countries including the United Kingdom, attacked and smeared China on Hong Kong-related issues,” he said. “The anti-China performance of a few Western countries has failed.”

TAGS: China, Hong Kong, security law

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.