'Balik Probinsya' program to generate more problems in rural areas — Gabriela | Inquirer News

‘Balik Probinsya’ program to generate more problems in rural areas — Gabriela

/ 08:12 PM May 28, 2020

MANILA, Philippines – The government’s “Balik Probinsya” program, which focuses on decongesting Metro Manila at a time of a global pandemic, would only translate to more healthcare and economic problems, a women’s group said on Thursday.

The Gabriela party-list explained that the Balik Probinsya, which literally translates to “return to the province,” is a huge risk especially after two persons who returned to Leyte through the program have tested positive for the latest coronavirus strain.


The program was pushed by President Rodrigo Duterte’s long-time aide and now Senator Bong Go to address the ongoing health crisis which has paralyzed most of Luzon, especially Metro Manila.

“Earlier this month, we’ve warned President Duterte that the Balik Probinsya, Bagong Pag-asa program will create a wave of COVID-19 infections due to the lack of mass testing. Now, Baybay City and Tanauan […] in Leyte have recorded their first coronavirus cases – both returning residents under the national government’s Balik Probinsya program,” Gabriela said.


The progressive group noted that the two cases cannot be set aside and simply be classified as isolated cases, because government failed to test the Balik Probinsya beneficiaries for coronavirus infection.

READ: ‘Balik Probinsiya’ risk: 2 of 100 returning to Leyte positive for coronavirus 

“This is not an isolated case. In the first place, the government implemented the Balik Probinsya program without testing its beneficiaries, knowing very well that the cases of coronavirus in the country is rising rapidly,” Gabriela noted.

“Second, it cannot possibly ensure balanced regional development with the program if it refuses to implement genuine land reform, national minimum wage, and the repeal of rice liberalization,” they added.

Go proposed the Balik Probinsya program last April, after several workers in Metro Manila who wanted to head back home to their provinces were trapped due to the enhanced community quarantine (ECQ).

According to Go, this program is intended to prepare for the new normal that would be sprouting out of the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, this proposal was met with widespread criticism as it allegedly showed the administration’s penchant for temporary measures instead of long-term solutions.


Gabriela, for its part, believes that the proper response to the COVID-19 pandemic is to provide means of livelihood and accessible healthcare programs.

“We need a long-term response to the coronavirus disease pandemic, and sending the poor to an even more vulnerable setting without healthcare and job opportunities will generate more problems in rural areas,”  the group said.

“The government should at least suspend the Balik Probinsya program given the rising cases of COVID-19,” they urged.


Wage is key issue in ‘Balik Probinsya’

TUCP: ‘Balik Probinsya’ program bound to fail

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link .

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: 2019 Novel Coronavirus, 2019-nCoV, balik probinsya, COVID-19, decongesting Metro Manila, Gabriela party-list, latest coronavirus strain, Leyte, lockdown, MECQ, Metro Manila, modified enhanced community quarantine, nCoV update, Philippine news updates, President Rodrigo Duterte, Senator Bong Go
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2021 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.