Manila judge disputes Isko: Court received no case on curfew violators | Inquirer News

Manila judge disputes Isko: Court received no case on curfew violators

/ 12:01 PM March 19, 2020

MANILA, Philippines – Despite drastically reducing operations, the Supreme Court has assured the public that it will continue to attend to urgent matters including cases for violating curfew ordinances.

The Supreme Court issued the statement after Manila Mayor Isko Moreno on Wednesday evening announced that 16 violators of Manila’s curfew ordinance have failed to post bail after courts in the city have suspended operations.

But according to Manila Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) Executive Judge Carissa Frondozo,  no case for violation of Manila’s curfew ordinance has been filed in court to date.

Article continues after this advertisement

“So far, wala pang fi-nafile sa amin na kahit anong violation ng curfew ordinance. I’ve informed the city administrator na mali ang sinabi ni Yorme (Mayor Isko Moreno). He [City Administrator] will relay the message daw,” Frondozo said in her message to Court Administrator Jose Midas Marquez.

FEATURED STORIES

Supreme Court’s Public Information Chief and Spokesperson Atty. Brian Keith Hosaka reiterated that “except for night courts which have been suspended, the RTCs (Regional Trial Courts) and MeTC maintain skeleton staff precisely to address urgent matters such as bail.”

“We have ensured the public that our courts, despite drastically reducing its operations, will continue to function to attend to important and urgent matters,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

During last Friday’s meeting, the High Court decided to adopt drastic measures to ensure the safety of its employees and officials amid the coronavirus pandemic without abandoning its constitutional mandate.

Article continues after this advertisement

Part of the measure is to maintain a skeleton staff from March 16 to April 15 to ensure the unimpeded service to the public.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES:

16 violators of Manila’s curfew unable to post bail due to suspended court offices

Article continues after this advertisement

SC imposes preventive measures vs coronavirus

/MUF
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link.

TAGS: Coronavirus, COVID-19, COVID19, Curfew, NcoV, ordinance, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.