Mexico vows to take Bolivia to court over embassy spat | Inquirer News

Mexico vows to take Bolivia to court over embassy spat

/ 07:13 AM December 27, 2019

Facade of the Mexican embassy in La Paz, Bolivia, on November 29, 2019. – Bolivia’s foreign minister Karen Longaric said Thursday Mexico will face a “very serious problem” if its embassy in La Paz refuses to hand over ex-government officials wanted for arrest, warning they could be there for years. More than 20 former members of ex-president Evo Morales’s government have holed up in the Mexican embassy. (Photo by JORGE BERNAL / AFP)

MEXICO CITY, Mexico — Mexico threatened Thursday to take Bolivia to the International Court of Justice over what it calls harassment of its diplomatic mission in La Paz, after its embassy sheltered some 20 officials from the former government.

The two countries have been in a spiraling spat since Mexico granted asylum to Bolivian ex-president Evo Morales, who resigned on November 10 in the face of mass protests, and granted refuge to top officials from his leftist government at its embassy.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mexico accuses Bolivia’s new interim government of responding with a campaign of “harassment and intimidation” by deploying a large contingent of police and intelligence officers outside the embassy. That move, according to Mexico, violates the 1961 Vienna Convention on the protected status of diplomatic missions.

FEATURED STORIES

Mexican Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard said his staff would file a complaint later Thursday with the International Court of Justice in the Hague.

“We are simply proposing that the integrity of our diplomatic installations, which are Mexican territory, be respected and preserved… as well as that of the people inside,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He called for the international community’s help to resolve the “emergency.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said that “not even (Augusto) Pinochet,” the late Chilean dictator, had violated foreign diplomatic missions so egregiously during his regime’s campaign to wipe out leftist opponents.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Let’s hope they think things over and respect the right to asylum,” said Lopez Obrador, a leftist leader elected last year.

Mexico’s top diplomat for Latin America, Maximiliano Reyes, called for a meeting in a third country to resolve the standoff.

Article continues after this advertisement

Bolivia’s interim government denied wrongdoing and accused Mexican officials of a “flagrant contradiction,” saying Mexico itself had requested increased security at its embassy and ambassador’s residence on three occasions.

Any complaint by Mexico to the International Court of Justice “would be rejected immediately,” said Bolivian Foreign Minister Karen Longaric.

“Bolivia has not violated the Vienna Convention,” she told a news conference.

Since right-wing interim president Jeanine Anez took over from Morales, the Bolivian authorities have issued arrest warrants for four of the ex-officials inside the Mexican embassy, accusing them of “sedition” and “terrorism” in connection with protest violence that killed 36 people.

Bolivia has been in turmoil since Morales, who had been in power since 2006, declared he won re-election to a controversial fourth term in a vote that was marred by accusations of fraud.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Morales, Bolivia’s first indigenous president, resigned after losing the army’s backing and fled to Mexico, then Argentina.

Edited by MUF
TAGS: Bolivia, Diplomacy, embassy, Mexico

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.