US House approves oil drilling ban off Atlantic, Pacific coasts | Inquirer News

US House approves oil drilling ban off Atlantic, Pacific coasts

/ 06:23 AM September 12, 2019

WASHINGTON  – The House approved legislation Wednesday that would permanently bar drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and extend a moratorium on drilling off Florida’s west coast.

 House approves oil drilling ban off Atlantic, Pacific coasts

FILE – This Jan. 7, 2013 file photo shows the floating drill rig Kulluk in Kodiak Island, Alaska’s Kiliuda Bay as salvage teams conduct an in-depth assessment of its seaworthiness. The House has approved legislation that would permanently bar drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and extend a moratorium on drilling off Florida’s west coast (James Brooks/Kodiak Daily Mirror via AP, File)/

Lawmakers approved the Atlantic and Pacific measure 238-189, while a bill to block drilling in the Gulf of Mexico near Florida was approved 248-180.

Coastal lawmakers from both parties said the bills would protect U.S. coasts from drilling that can pollute crucial waters — and lead to disasters such as the 2010 BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Article continues after this advertisement

Opponents, mostly Republicans, said the bills undercut domestic energy security and limit thousands of job opportunities.

FEATURED STORIES

The bills head to the Republican-controlled Senate, where action is unlikely.

They come as the Trump administration is reevaluating a plan to sharply expand offshore drilling amid a series of court challenges.

Article continues after this advertisement

Governors and lawmakers from Republican- and Democratic-leaning states strongly oppose expanded drilling. A federal judge in March ruled against President Donald Trump’s executive order to open the Arctic Ocean and parts of the Atlantic to broader oil and gas development, saying Trump had exceeded his authority.

Article continues after this advertisement

Interior Secretary David Bernhardt has called the legal challenges “discombobulating” to the administration’s plans and said officials are likely to wait for the court cases to be resolved before proceeding with offshore drilling.

Article continues after this advertisement

Even so, lawmakers who oppose drilling said a legislative fix is needed.

“If we don’t act, drilling rigs could soon appear on our beaches,” said Rep. Joe Cunningham, D-S.C., the lead sponsor of the bicoastal drilling ban. Cunningham won his seat last year in part because of his opposition to drilling off South Carolina’s beach-dominated coast.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Low Country (near Charleston, S.C.) is a force to be reckoned with, and we stand firm in our opposition to drilling off our shoreline,” Cunningham said. Offshore drilling could ruin the state’s tourism-based economy, “ruin our vibrant natural resources” and harm the state’s “unique way of life,” he said.

Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, denounced the “liberal legislation aimed at derailing our domestic energy production and strong economy.” The House-passed bill would stifle development of the nation’s abundant fossil-fuel resources, increase reliance on foreign countries and “jeopardize unprecedented economic growth seen in recent years,” Bishop said.

Bishop and other Republicans touted an alternative bill that would boost drilling on federal lands and offshore.

The GOP bill “is for all energy, all of the above, both fossil fuel and alternative, one that actually will grow our economy, create more jobs and give a logical standard of what we should do,” Bishop said.

Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., said offshore drilling would devastate his state’s “beautiful beaches, our workforce and our economy,” adding, “I’ll fight any effort to pollute our coasts with drilling.”

Offshore drilling would harm New Jersey’s booming tourism and fishing industries, Pascrell said, adding that it also could have a devastating impact on climate change. “As yet another report today makes clear, the earth is getting hotter. We need solutions, not more drilling,” he said.

Tim Charters, vice president of the National Ocean Industries Association, said the twin House votes Wednesday “should be recognized as what they are: the opening salvo of the so-called Green New Deal.” Bills to block drilling “are not about limiting emissions or protecting the environment,” he said. “They are about normalizing a shortsighted vision of an America where affordable and reliable energy resources are locked away indefinitely.”

Alex Taurel of the League of Conservation Voters said the votes were “further proof that protecting coastal economies from President Trump’s plans to radically expand offshore drilling is not a partisan issue — it’s common sense.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The question now, Taurel added, is whether Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will allow votes on the bills “or will he continue to operate the Senate as a legislative graveyard and leave states like Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Maine at risk of offshore drilling?” /gsg

TAGS: Atlantic, House, latest news, Oil drilling, Pacific, world news

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.