SC affirms dismissal of reckless imprudence raps vs Aquino on SAF 44's death | Inquirer News

SC affirms dismissal of reckless imprudence raps vs Aquino on SAF 44’s death

/ 05:56 PM September 03, 2019

MANILA, Philippines–The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Office of the Ombudsman finding no reason to charge former President Benigno Aquino III, former Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Alan Purisima and former PNP-Special Action Force (SAF) head Getulio Napenas with reckless imprudence resulting in homicide for the 2015 Mamasapano bloodbath.

Voting unanimously (15-0), the high court ruled that the Ombudsman did not commit grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction when it dismissed the complaint against Aquino, Purisima and Napeñas.

“The court held that the Ombudsman did not commit grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction in dismissing the complaints for 44 counts of reckless imprudence resulting in multiple homicide filed against private respondents,” the SC said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Wherefore, the petition is dismissed. The Ombudsman’s consolidated resolution dated June 13, 2017 and consolidated order dated September 5, 2017 are affirmed insofar as they found no probable cause to charge private respondents Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III, Alan Purisima and Getulio Napenas with reckless imprudence resulting in homicide,” it added.

FEATURED STORIES

In 2017, the Office of the Ombudsman indicted Aquino, Purisima and Napenas for violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (graft and usurpation of authority) for their role in the Mamasapano operation.

The charges against Aquino, Purisima and Napenas were filed before the Sandiganbayan in November 2017 during the time of former Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales.

Article continues after this advertisement

But relatives and family members of the slain SAF commandos petitioned the High Court asking that Aquino be charged instead with reckless imprudence resulting in homicide. They were supported in their petition by Solicitor General Jose Calida.

Article continues after this advertisement

Calida said Morales disregarded the sufficiency of the evidence against the former president when she indicted him instead for graft and usurpation of authority.

Article continues after this advertisement

The SC issued the TRO in February 7, 2018, just before Aquino, Purisima and Napenas were to be arraigned on the reckless imprudence case.

Then, Ombudsman Samuel Martires moved to withdraw the remaining cases against Aquino before the Sandiganbayan. With the lifting of restraining order on Aug. 7, the Sandiganbayan granted Martires’ request. /jpv

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORY: 

Sandigan grants Ombudsman’s bid to drop graft, usurpation raps vs Aquino

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Local news, Mamasapano, PNP-SAF, SAF 44

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.