The right to privacy | Inquirer News

The right to privacy

08:01 AM December 23, 2011

THE right to privacy has recently been invoked several times in the argument against the recent revenue issuances by the Bureau of Internal Revenue imposing disclosure requirements in amending the tax forms required to be filed by every taxpayer.

This included Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 57-2011, which has already been rectified and amended by Revenue Regulation No. 19-2011. Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 57-2011 required taxpayers to reveal additional information about their other sources of income.

With this background, we examined the legal basis of the right to privacy of every individual.

Article continues after this advertisement

The essence of privacy is the “right to be let alone.” (Cooley on Torts, Sec. 135, vol. 1, 4th ed., (1932); see also Warren and Brandeis, “The Right to Privacy,” 4 Harvard Law Review 193-220 [1890] — this article greatly influenced the enactment of privacy statutes in the United States (Cortes, I., The Constitutional Foundations of Privacy, p. 15 (1970)).

FEATURED STORIES

In the American case of Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 14 L. ed. 2d 510 (1965), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy has a constitutional foundation. In the case of Morfe v. Mutuc, 22 SCRA 424, the Philippine Supreme Court adopted the Griswold ruling that there is a constitutional right to privacy. The court held:

“Griswold invalidated a Connecticut statute which made the use of contraceptives a criminal offense on the ground of its amounting to an unconstitutional invasion of the right to privacy of married persons; rightfully it stressed ‘a relationship lying within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees.’ It has wider implications though. The constitutional right to privacy has come into its own.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The right of privacy is enshrined in several provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. We quote Section 3(1) of the Bill of Rights as follows:

Article continues after this advertisement

“Sec. 3. (1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise as prescribed by law.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The right to privacy is also heavily protected in various provisions of the Bill of Rights in the 1987 Philippine Constitution, namely:

“Sec. 1. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.

Article continues after this advertisement

Sec. 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.”

* * *

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

You may contact the author at rester. nonato @yahoo.com.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.