PAO lawyers ask Ombudsman to suspend chief, forensics head | Inquirer News

PAO lawyers ask Ombudsman to suspend chief, forensics head

/ 05:32 AM August 15, 2019

Persida Acosta

MANILA, Philippines — Lawyers from the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO) have asked the Ombudsman to suspend the agency’s head, Persida Acosta, and forensics chief Erwin Erfe for alleged corruption.

In a statement submitted to the Office of the Ombudsman, a copy of which was obtained by the Inquirer, the lawyers — PAO employees with Salary Grade 26 and higher — claimed that Acosta and her allies in the financial and management service had a “systematic scheme” for defrauding the government by doctoring purchase orders to make agency funds available to Acosta.


The lawyers did not identify themselves in the statement for fear of reprisal.

But they said Acosta should be immediately suspended.


The statement was filed in intervention in an earlier graft complaint filed by Wilfredo Garrido Jr. against Acosta.

‘Systematic scheme’

“Despite the pendency of the instant complaint filed by complainant Garrido, respondents Acosta and Erfe, through their cohorts in Financial Planning and Management Service, have a systematic scheme in covering traces of their capricious, illegal and corrupt practices especially relating to the disbursements and allocation of the PAO budget,” the lawyers said.

Acosta denied the lawyers’ accusations. She told the Inquirer by phone that she had not received a copy of the statement, but she believed it was part of a smear campaign.

“They are just trying to destroy my reputation. And if it is anonymous, if there is no signature, that is just a malicious scrap of paper,” she said.

She added that there had been several complaints against her, but she had not been ordered suspended by the Ombudsman.

“We are just trying to help victims and this is just some media blitz,” Acosta said.


Erfe had not responded to the Inquirer’s request for comment as of Wednesday night.

Rules of Court

The filing of a statement in intervention is allowed under the Rules of Court.

The Ombudsman can entertain complaints sent anonymously, according to information on its website.

But its rules state that a complaint that does not disclose the identity of the complainant “will be acted upon only if it merits appropriate consideration, or contains sufficient leads or particulars to enable the taking of further action.”

According to the statement, the intervenors are current employees in the PAO central office, particularly on the executive support staff, field operations and statistics office and legal research service.

Ombudsman Samuel Martires said his agency would “look into the truthfulness and veracity” of the complaint.

“There are some anonymous complaints that have attachments that guide us [in our investigation]. If there are none, of course it will be much harder. But we will still look into these,” Martires said.

Asked about the progress of the graft complaint filed against Acosta, Martires said it had not yet reached his desk.

PAO forensic lab

In his complaint filed in May, Garrido said Acosta and Erfe created the PAO forensic laboratory without authorization from Congress.

Garrido accused Acosta and Erfe of graft, falsification of public documents, malversation of public funds, illegal use of public funds or property, as well as grave misconduct, serious dishonesty, grave abuse of authority and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of public service.

But in the statement filed in intervention, the PAO lawyers alleged that Acosta and Erfe just established the forensic laboratory without authorization from Congress.

They accused Acosta of “entrenched” corruption at the agency, since she had allegedly placed loyal staffers in the finance service.

Loyal CPAs

“Respondent Acosta has two loyal certified public accountants, Lira Hosea Suangco and Maerick Sales, at her disposal. Suangco and Sales are cousins … and they also belong to the same religion as respondent Acosta, which is the Iglesia ng Dios kay Cristo Jesus, Haligi at Suhay ng Katotohanan,” the lawyers said.

According to the lawyers, Suangco and Sales, as well as the officer in charge of finance, Alma Latosa, are “fiercely loyal” to Acosta, and that they have a system that funnels PAO funds directly to the agency chief.

Suangco is allegedly in charge of maintaining and monitoring PAO supplies.

“At the behest of respondent Acosta, Suangco prepared purchase orders for additional office supplies in 2018, despite having an overstock in 2017,” the lawyers said, adding that Sales would certify that funds were available for the purchase orders, and Latosa would automatically approve the release of the budget.

Funds misused

“When the funds were released, it was immediately surrendered to respondent Acosta. The funds that were intended for the purchase of office supplies were never used for its intended purpose,” the lawyers said.

In July, the Commission on Audit (COA) called out the PAO over some P13.1 million in excess office supplies that it allegedly purchased in excess of its allocation.

But the PAO told the audit body that due to “the influx of Dengvaxia cases,” office supplies must readily be available for use.

A separate source, however, informed the Inquirer that the funds were not actually used to buy supplies.

The same source, who is familiar with the workings of the PAO but refused to be identified, said the lawyers who filed the statement were part of Acosta’s  circle.

“Two of the lawyers who are part of those who filed the manifestation sit in the meetings where Acosta talks about how she will easily beat the graft charges,” the source said

The lawyers also said in their statement that Acosta had “pirated” one Marylin Balbin, a former auditor with the COA.

Balbin was allegedly hired because of her connections, and she now serves as the “middle person” between the PAO and the COA, the lawyers said.

They also said Acosta “ambulance chases” families of children who had died after receiving the dengue vaccine Dengvaxia, coercing them to seek the PAO’s help in pursuing their cases.

Sample letter

The lawyers said Acosta went as far as giving the families a sample letter soliciting PAO services, which they were then instructed to copy on pad paper for “authenticity.”

Acosta and Erfe also used PAO funds to purchase tarpaulin, T-shirts and coffins that the parents used in rallies, the lawyers said.

The lawyers sought the immediate preventive suspension of the two officials to prevent them from destroying evidence of their alleged corruption.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: doctored purchase orders, Erwin Erfe, Office of the Ombudsman, PAO, Perside Acosta, Public Attorney's Office
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

News that matters

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2023 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.