SC upholds conviction vs blogger who accused Drilon of corruption |

SC upholds conviction vs blogger who accused Drilon of corruption

/ 03:36 PM August 07, 2019

SC upholds conviction vs blogger who accused Drilon of corruption

INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court (SC) has affirmed the libel conviction against an Ilonggo blogger over his social media posts accusing Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon of corrupt activities. 


In a resolution dated June 10, SC’s Second Division upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) finding blogger Manuel Mejorada guilty of four counts of libel.

Article continues after this advertisement


The appellate court’s decision affirmed with modification the earlier decision of the Pasay City Regional Trial Court (RTC) sentencing Mejorada with imprisonment of two years and four months and one day, at the minimum, to four years and two months, at the maximum, for each count. 

FEATURED STORIES

The sentence was to be served simultaneously. 

READ: CA denies Drilon critic’s appeal to reverse ruling on libel case

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: CA upholds earlier conviction, jail term for libel case vs Drilon critic

Article continues after this advertisement

According to SC, the prosecution was successful in establishing the elements of libel in Mejorada’s remarks. 

Article continues after this advertisement

“As correctly ruled by the CA, the elements of libel were sufficiently established by the prosecution,” the high court’s resolution reads. 

“It was not necessary to establish that the publication was motivated by any malice since the articles were not privileged communication or fair comments; thus, malice is presumed,” it added. 

Article continues after this advertisement

SC also explained that Mejorada failed to “present any proof that the statements were based on established and documented facts,” thus, negating his claims that the comments were made in good faith. 

“The Court did not remove the discretion of the trial courts to impose imprisonment if, under the circumstances, a fine was insufficient to meet the demands of substantial justice or would depreciate the seriousness of the offense,” the ruling further states.

Drilon, meanwhile, welcomed SC’s decision. 

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We welcome the High Court’s decision. I have nothing else to leave behind except my reputation, so I am grateful for this favorable decision,” Drilon said. /kga

TAGS: blogger, court, Libel, Local news, Nation, national news, News, Philippine news updates, Politics, suit, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.