CA denies Drilon critic’s appeal to reverse ruling on libel case | Inquirer News
Close  

CA denies Drilon critic’s appeal to reverse ruling on libel case

By: - Reporter / @ConsINQ
/ 06:47 PM October 24, 2018
Manuel Mejorada (right), former provincial administrator of Iloilo, and Senate President Franklin Drilon (left). INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Manuel Mejorada (right), former provincial administrator of Iloilo, and former Senate President Franklin Drilon (left). INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

The Court of Appeals (CA) reiterated its laws on defamation, saying it would provide sanctions on malicious statements against public officers.

This was said in a 27-page ruling dated Sept. 18 and released on Oct. 10 which denied Manuel “Boy” Mejorada’s petition to reverse the Pasay court’s ruling that found him guilty of libel.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senator Franklin Drilon had accused former Iloilo province administrator Mejorada of libel after he posted stories on his social media accounts and blogs accusing the senator of graft, saying he was involved in irregularities in infrastructure projects in Iloilo.

“Unfounded and malicious statements made by against another are not per se constitutionally protected speech,” the document read.

FEATURED STORIES

“If the utterances are false, malicious or unrelated to a public officer’s performance of his duties, the same may give rise to criminal liability as in this case,” it added.

Last Feb. 20, 2017, the Pasay City Regional Trial Court Branch 118, then said Mejorada was guilty of libel and subjected to imprisonment of up to four years and two months.

Libel is described as “defamatory tending to cause dishonor, discredit or contempt malicious in law or in fact which must be given publicity and the victim must be identifiable.”

READ: Drilon critic sentenced to up to 4 years in prison for libel

Mejorada, then, filed a motion for reconsideration, but the RTC denied his reconsideration on May 16, 2017 for “lack of merit.”

He then filed a petition for review at CA, saying the Pasay RTC “erred in the ruling that he is guilty of libel” and that it convicted him of libel despite Drilon’s failure to testify in the Court.

The CA’s second division denied Mejorada’s motion, saying he “already admitted the authorship of the libelous articles.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Wherefore, in view of the foregoing, the instant appeal is denied,” the document read.

“The accused-apellant (Mejorada) did not do research before making his allegations and it has been shown that these allegations were baseless. The articles are not fair and true reports, but merely wild accusations,” it added.

CA added that Drilon’s appearance at the court would be futile because he will only “identify Mejorada whose identity has already been stipulated.” /je

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Court of Appeals, Franklin Drilon, Local news, Manuel Mejorada, News, Regions
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.