SC justices in a bind over petition to protect West Philippine Sea | Inquirer News

SC justices in a bind over petition to protect West Philippine Sea

/ 08:33 PM July 02, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — Justices of the Supreme Court are in a bind over a petition asking them to compel the government to protect the West Philippine Sea. One justice even said they may be “asking for the impossible.”

Fisherfolk from Palawan and Zambales want the high court to compel the government to run after Chinese vessels that intruded into the country in 2012, 2013 and 2014.

Counsels for the petitioners said they do not have the names of the people inside the Chinese vessels that allegedly intruded into the country’s territory, but they have the names of the vessels.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I am trying to understand exactly. I’m trying to understand the specifics and particulars of exactly what it is you want to happen […] to initiate criminal suits against these people in the vessels who did these things in 2012, 2013 and 2014?” Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa said.

FEATURED STORIES

One of the counsels for the petitioners, lawyer Andre C. Palacios said they are hoping this action “will create a deterrent against continuing violations in the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone.”

“Are you not asking for the impossible?” Caguioa asked. “2012, 2013 and 2014 for these vessels that may no longer be there and you cannot even certify as a fact that they [vessels] are still there.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Associate Justice Francis Jardeleza added that the petition “fails to state a cause of action.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Your allegation is lack of enforcement. You do not allege the ultimate facts — who did not do what, where…you have no allegations much less judicial affidavit,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Associate Justices Estela Perlas-Bernabe and Diosdado Peralta also questioned the lack of a judicial affidavit of the fisherfolk who could have been used as evidence for a cause of action that the petitioners wanted to push.

For his part, Associate Justice Ramon Paul Hernando said the alleged inaction of the government does not refer to the current administration. He added that holding the government liable for their inaction should include Caguioa, who was a former Justice Secretary.

Article continues after this advertisement

The oral argument will continue next Tuesday. (Editor: Eden Estopace)

RELATED STORY:
SC asked to direct gov’t execs to enforce environmental laws in West PH Sea
SC issues writ of kalikasan to protect contested WPS fishing grounds

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: China, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.