Nograles: Mutual defense treaty applicable only in case of 'armed attack' | Inquirer News

Nograles: Mutual defense treaty applicable only in case of ‘armed attack’

/ 05:13 PM June 18, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippines’ Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT) with the United States may only be invoked in case of an “armed attack,” a senior Palace official said Tuesday.

“[The] MDT can only be used if there is an armed attack on a public vessel, on troops, on an airship. That’s when the MDT takes effect,” Cabinet Secretary Karlo Nograles told reporters in Malacañang.

“If it is not a military attack then I don’t think that mechanism is even available. We’re not even gonna start talking about that. I don’t think…If you read the MDT [it’s] very clear, it’s a military attack. It’s only invoked [if there is military oppression],” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Nograles issued the statement after Senator Panfilo Lacson said that the 66-year-old pact is the “only weapon in our arsenal” if the tension in the West Philippine Sea escalates following the ramming of a Filipino fishing vessel near Recto Bank.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Treaty with US is only ‘weapon’ in PH arsenal, says Lacson

Presidential Spokesman Salvador Panelo said invoking the MDT now is like “jumping to a conclusion” as the government has yet to shed light on the incident in the Recto Bank involving a Chinese vessel.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Ang ibig sabihin kasi nun may aggression, e wala hindi pa nga natin alam ang facts e. Kung sinalakay tayo, then that treaty will be in operation. But we don’t know the facts yet,” Panelo, who is also President Duterte’s chief legal counsel, said in a Palace briefing.

Article continues after this advertisement

(That means there is an aggression, but we don’t know the facts yet. If they invaded us, then the treaty will be in operation. But we don’t know the facts yet.)

Article continues after this advertisement

According to the Filipino fishermen, they were abandoned and left floating in open sea for hours after a Chinese vessel crashed into their boat F/B Gem-Vir 1.

However, the Chinese Embassy in Manila denied that their vessel abandoned the Filipino fishermen, claiming that it fled because it was besieged by other Philippine boats. (Editor: Eden Estopace)

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: ‘Chinese crew’s desertion of distressed fishermen a violation of maritime protocols’

READ: China: No such thing as hit-and-run incident

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEO

TAGS: China, Malacañang

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.