Chinese court holds off ruling on Canadian's death penalty appeal | Inquirer News

Chinese court holds off ruling on Canadian’s death penalty appeal

/ 01:54 PM May 09, 2019

Chinese court holds off ruling on Canadian's death penalty appeal

This photo taken on January 14, 2019 shows the Dalian Intermediate People’s Court before the retrial of Canadian Robert Lloyd Schellenberg on drug trafficking charges, in Dalian, China’s northeast Liaoning province. AFP

BEIJING, China — A Chinese court adjourned a hearing on a Canadian man’s appeal against his death sentence for drug smuggling without a decision Thursday in a case that has deepened a diplomatic spat between Beijing and Ottawa.

Robert Lloyd Schellenberg, 36, was sentenced to death in January after a court deemed his previous 15-year prison sentence too lenient.

Article continues after this advertisement

His appeal hearing came a day after a top executive of Chinese telecom giant Huawei, Meng Wanzhou, appeared in court in Canada to fight a US extradition bid that triggered the diplomatic storm.

FEATURED STORIES

The Liaoning High People’s Court in northeast China said in a statement that “all procedural rights of appellant Schellenberg were guaranteed in accordance with the law.”

The trial has adjourned and the court will “select a day or time to pronounce the sentence,” it said without specifying.

Article continues after this advertisement

Schellenberg’s case is seen as potential leverage for Meng, who was arrested on a US extradition request related to Iran sanctions violations — a link that Beijing has repeatedly denied.

Article continues after this advertisement

Following the Huawei executive’s arrest in December, China detained former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig and businessman Michael Spavor, in what observers saw as retaliation.

Article continues after this advertisement

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said that China had “chosen to arbitrarily” sentence Schellenberg to death. His government has pleaded for clemency.

Ottawa said Wednesday it was “extremely concerned that China has chosen to apply the death penalty, a cruel and inhumane punishment”.

Article continues after this advertisement

Canadian officials were expected to attend Thursday’s hearing.

Canadians detained

Schellenberg was originally sentenced to 15 years in prison and a 150,000 yuan ($22,000) forfeiture in November.

But following an appeal, the high court in Liaoning ruled in December that the sentence was too lenient given the severity of his crimes.

About a month later, his sentence was changed to capital punishment.

China has executed foreigners for drug-related crimes in the past, including a Japanese national in 2014, a Filipina in 2013, and a Briton in 2009.

Last week another Canadian, Fan Wei, was sentenced to death for drug trafficking in a separate case in southern China.
Kovrig and Spavor, meanwhile, have been denied access to lawyers and are allowed only monthly consular visits.

Days after Canada launched the extradition process against Meng in March, China announced it suspected Kovrig of spying and stealing state secrets. It alleged fellow Canadian Spavor had provided him with intelligence.

Meanwhile, Huawei’s Meng was back in court in Vancouver on Wednesday, with her lawyers arguing that the US case was politically motivated.

Her firm says she is innocent.

Huawei is also in the US crosshairs as Washington seeks to convince Western nations to shun the telecom firm over security concerns.

The diplomatic row appears to have has spilled over into the economic arena: China has banned Canadian canola and pork shipments worth billions of dollars.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Ottawa has pressed Washington — which is locked in a trade dispute with China — to step up its pressure on behalf of the detained Canadians. /ee

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.