MMDA’s provincial bus ban on Edsa needs further review, officials admit

/ 01:26 PM May 06, 2019
MMDA’s provincial bus ban on Edsa needs further review, officials admit

EDSA (Phoyo by Jam Sta. Rosa)

MANILA, Philippines — The Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) policy banning provincial buses along Edsa still needs further review, officials admitted Monday, moments after they announced the suspension of the scheme’s dry run.

READ: MMDA suspends dry run of provincial bus ban


MMDA traffic chief Bong Nebrija and Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) chairman Martin Delgra said they would still meet with the Department of Transportation (DOTr) to iron out “specifics” for the implementation of MMDA Resolution No. 19-2, which asks local governments to revoke or stop the issuance of business permits to provincial bus terminals on Edsa and bars provincial buses from utilizing Metro Manila’s main highway.

“We need to come out with the specific numbers ano. Ilan ‘yung bus na ie-extend, ilan ‘yung provincial bus na ika-cut, anu-ano ‘yung mga ‘yun, ano ‘yung mga provincial buses na gagamitin for P2P (Point-to-Point), ano ‘yung mga stations na pwede gamitin for P2P,” Nebrija acknowledged in an interview after an oversight hearing at the House of Representatives.


The policy’s enforcement dry run started last April 22. Nebrija said the suspension of the dry run might also delay the closure of bus terminals along Edsa, which was originally set this June.

“All of these, mahirap natin i-dry run kung wala tayong specifics. So itong meeting na ito will go down to the details,” Nebrija also said, citing how very few bus companies tried their integrated terminals in Santa Rosa, Laguna for those coming from the south, and Valenzuela City for those from the north.

He said the policy was also suspended to prevent inconveniences for individuals who would travel back to provinces for the May 13 midterm elections, as well as to prevent some groups from “politicizing” the policy.

Delgra, for his part, said they decided to push back the timeline for the opening of Sta. Rosa City and Valenzuela City provincial bus terminals.

MMDA’s provincial bus ban on Edsa needs further review, officials admit

SLOW DAY The Santa Rosa Integrated Terminal in Laguna province is quiet as only a handful of buses stop here to drop off or pick up passengers while the MMDA is implementing the dry run of the ban on provincial buses on Edsa. —MARICAR CINCO

“Pina-plantsa pa ‘yung ibang mga detalye kaya we have decided with MMDA to suspended the timeline as regards the opening of these two terminals (Sta. Rosa and Valenzuela),” he noted.

According to Delgra, MMDA and LTFRB will still study issues concerning the controversial policy, including the rerouting of city and provincial buses going to the two integrated terminals.

Rep. Ronald Ang of Ako Bicol Partylist, which earlier asked the Supreme Court to stop the implementation of the provincial bus ban on Edsa, welcomed the postponement of MMDA’s policy. He said the suspension only proves that MMDA Resolution No. 19-2 still needs deeper studies and public consultations.


READ: SC asked to stop ban on provincial buses along Edsa

“Kami po sa Ako Bicol ay natutuwa po sa hakbang na ginawa ng MMDA ngayong araw na ito… kinatigan po ng MMDA na kailangan po ng masusing pag-aaral at kailangan po ng public hearings bago po tayo magkaroon ng bagong panukala katulad ng ginawa nila,” Ang said.

READ: MMDA stands by Edsa bus ban despite TRO bid


Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Ako Bicol Partylist, Bong Nebrija, Edsa, Local news, LTFRB, Martin Delgra, Metro, metro news, MMDA, MMDA Resolution No. 19-2, Nation, national news, news, Philippine news updates, provincial bus, provincial bus ban
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.