Malaysia won't drop case against Vietnamese in Kim killing | Inquirer News

Malaysia won’t drop case against Vietnamese in Kim killing

/ 03:50 PM March 14, 2019

Malaysia won't drop case against Vietnamese in Kim killing

Vietnamese Doan Thi Huong (center) is escorted by police as she leaves Shah Alam High Court in Shah Alam, Malaysia on March 14, 2019. AP

SHAH ALAM, Malaysia — Malaysia’s attorney-general ordered the murder case to proceed against a Vietnamese woman accused in the killing of the estranged half brother of North Korea’s leader, prosecutors said in court Thursday.

Prosecutor Iskandar Ahmad gave no explanation for the refusal to drop the murder charge against Doan Thi Huong, who is the only suspect in custody after the stunning decision Monday to drop the case against Indonesian Siti Aisyah.

Article continues after this advertisement

The decision to move forward with Huong’s case was slammed by both her lawyer and Vietnam’s ambassador, who had hoped she would be given the same leniency as Aisyah.

FEATURED STORIES

Ambassador Le Quy Quynh said he was “very disappointed” with the decision. He said Vietnam’s justice minister had written to the Malaysian attorney-general seeking Huong’s release and that Vietnam would keep lobbying Malaysia to free her.

“We will request Malaysia to have fair judgment and release her as soon as possible,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Huong’s lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik was more blunt, telling the court the decision was “perverse.” He said prosecutors were being unfair to Huong as her case was similar to Aisyah.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Very obviously, there is discrimination. The AG favored one party to the other,” Teh said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Huong and Aisyah were accused of smearing the toxic VX nerve agent on Kim Jong Nam’s face in an airport terminal in Kuala Lumpur on Feb. 13, 2017. They have said they thought they were taking part in a harmless prank for a TV show.

They were the only people in custody after four North Korean suspects fled the country the same morning Kim was killed. Both women were charged separately but the charge against them is the same: That they had colluded with the four North Korean suspects to murder Kim.

Article continues after this advertisement

A High Court judge last August had found there was enough evidence to infer that Aisyah, Huong and the four North Koreans engaged in a “well-planned conspiracy” to kill Kim.

Lawyers for the women argued that they were pawns in a political assassination with clear links to the North Korean Embassy in Kuala Lumpur, and that the prosecution failed to show the women had any intention to kill. Intent to kill is crucial to a murder charge under Malaysian law.

Huong’s lawyer sought a deferment of the trial Thursday, saying she was unwell and needed medical treatment. He said Huong only slept an hour a night since Aisyah’s release and was not in a position to testify.

When asked by the judge if she was unwell, Huong stood in the dock and said she suffered from tension and stress.

“I have no idea what is going on,” a tired and pale-looking Huong, who was wrapped in a red headscarf and a coat, said through an interpreter.

The judge agreed to postpone the trial until April 1 but warned there should be no more delay. The defense phase of the trial was to have begun Monday.

Huong was sobbing as she spoke to Vietnamese Embassy officials after Thursday’s court hearing ended.
In Huong’s village in Vietnam, her family was crestfallen.

“I had hoped for good news today, but unfortunately there is none. I’m very sad and disappointed. I had hoped my daughter would be freed like the Indonesian woman,” said her 66-year-old father Doan Van Thanh.

He said he believes his daughter is innocent and told her to “stay calm and hope for the best outcome.”

Huong’s stepmother, Nguyen Thi Vy, was in tears as she slammed the court’s decision.

“It’s so unfair. They were together, did the same thing,” she said.

Huong could face a death sentence if she is convicted.

Naran Singh, another lawyer for Huong, said it was very rare for the attorney-general to drop a murder case after the judge had called for their defense. He urged the attorney-general to be transparent and explain why he dropped the case against Aisyah but not Huong.

During the prosecution phase of the trial, expert witnesses testified that acute VX poisoning caused Kim’s death and the nerve agent was detected on his face, in his eyes and on his clothing. The witnesses said traces of VX were found on both women’s clothes as well as on Huong’s fingernails.

Analysts have said the case against Aisyah appeared weaker since there was no video evidence of her accosting Kim at the airport. There was security camera footage of Huong.

Prosecutors have contended the women were trained assassins who knew they were handling poison because they carefully held out their hands away from their bodies and went to separate restrooms to wash their hands afterward.

The defense phase of the trial is expected to shift the focus onto the absent North Koreans. Defense lawyers have said the women were hired to play pranks on strangers and had done several such pranks before the attack on Kim. Prosecutors have also said the VX was supplied by the North Korean suspects.

Airport security footage played during the women’s trial showed all four of the men at the airport during the attack, discarding their belongings and changing their outfits later. They were then seen meeting a North Korean Embassy official and an Air Koryo official before flying out of the country.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

On Malaysia’s request, Interpol has issued arrest warrant for the four men, who are believed to be back in Pyongyang, but North Korea is not a member of the organization. /ee

TAGS: murder case

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.