Andaya: Nothing illegal in House move to itemize allocations under DOH budget | Inquirer News

Andaya: Nothing illegal in House move to itemize allocations under DOH budget

By: - Reporter / @DYGalvezINQ
/ 05:38 PM March 06, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — There is nothing unconstitutional, illegal or surprising in the House of Representative’s move to identify the items under the Department of Health’s (DOH) 2019 budget, House Appropriations committee chair Rolando Andaya Jr. maintained Wednesday.

“There is nothing illegal or surprising that happened because if it’s merely a lump-sum. How will we distribute this to different hospitals?” Andaya said in a press conference.

Andaya issued the remark after Senator Panfilo Lacson alleged that Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo realigned the P25-million budget from the DOH to benefit “favored” congressmen.

Article continues after this advertisement

The P25 million supposedly earmarked for “favored congressmen” will be taken from the P15-billion lump-sum fund under the DOH’s Health Facilities Enhancement Program (HFEP), the Senator said.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Lacson: Arroyo realigns P25M budget to ‘favored’ solons

Andaya explained that when the bicameral conference committee approved the budget, there were no details provided on how the P15-billion lump-sum fund under the  HFEP will be distributed.

Article continues after this advertisement

He added that it was only agreed upon recently that the share of the House is P4.5 billion, the Senate P2 billion and the DOH P8.5 billion.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Kaya nga tinawagan natin yung mga miyembro ng House, the same way the Senate also asked their members kung saan ba natin ilalagay itong pondong ito,” Andaya said.

Article continues after this advertisement

(That is why we asked the members of the House, the same way the Senate also asked their members, to discuss how the fund should be distributed.)

“‘Yun naman yung napagkasunduan, ‘yun ang ginawa namin… (That’s what we did) Nothing illegal, nothing unconstitutional, it’s all within the framework of the bicameral conference report signed by the members of both houses” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Andaya also denied Lacson’s claim that Arroyo ordered the preparation of the DOH appropriations for HFEP worth P25 million “in individual allocations for her favored congressmen, including a P2.5 million allocation for the purchase of an ambulance.”

He said the members of the House used as guidelines the “menu of the DOH” to decide on the fund allocation and not the “House’s menu” or the “Speaker’s menu.”

“It is not the House’s menu or the Speaker’s menu; it is the menu or the program identification given to us by the DOH,” he added.

He further explained that the DOH’s menu provides that the funds be allocated to equipment, medical mobile transport, or the completion of repairs in the rehabilitation or the improvement of barangay health stations, rural health units, district hospitals, and national government hospitals.

The House Appropriations committee chair also maintained that the lower chamber of Congress is only “doing its job in trying to make health care accessible to everyone” when it itemized the appropriations of the DOH budget.

READ: Lacson: ‘House just itemizing the budget? My foot’

He explained that there was no budget allocated to districts for the HFEP in the past.

“Noong dumating yung DOH budget sa House, zero halos lahat ng mga distrito when it comes to health facilities enhancement program,” he said.

(When the DOH budget was submitted to the House, all districts has zero budget for the health facilities enhancement program.)

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We actually did our job in trying to make health care accessible to everyone,” Andaya added. /ee

TAGS: DOH budget

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.