7 of 10 Filipinos believe policemen involved in illegal drug trade, EJKs | Inquirer News

7 of 10 Filipinos believe policemen involved in illegal drug trade, EJKs

/ 05:20 AM March 01, 2019

NO EXCEPTIONS Malacañang says there are “rotten eggs” in any organization, including the police.

The majority of Filipinos believe that the police are involved in the illegal drug trade and extrajudicial killings (EJKs), and are planting evidence against drug suspects, a Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey indicated.

The noncommissioned survey, conducted from Dec. 16 to 19 last year, found that 68 percent of respondents believed that it was “definitely” or “probably true” that police were involved in the illegal drug trade, while 26 percent were undecided.

Article continues after this advertisement

Only 5 percent said it was “definitely” or “probably not true.”

FEATURED STORIES

In Malacañang, presidential spokesperson Salvador Panelo acknowledged that there are “rotten eggs” in any organization, but the government has “zero tolerance” for policemen involved in illegal activities.

“As (President Duterte) himself said, ‘There will be hell to pay if you become worse than criminals,’” Panelo said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Metro Manila sentiment

Article continues after this advertisement

The majority sentiment about police involvement in the drug trade was expressed in Metro Manila (75 percent), Balance Luzon (68 percent), Mindanao (67 percent), and the Visayas (66 percent).

Article continues after this advertisement

The survey also indicated that 66 percent of respondents believed that it was “definitely” or “probably true” that the police were involved in the extrajudicial killing of alleged drug suspects, with 28 percent undecided, and 5 percent saying it was “definitely” or “probably not true.”

Across geographical areas, 72 percent of Metro Manila respondents believed police involvement in EJKs, followed by Balance Luzon with 67 percent, and the Visayas and Mindanao, with 63 percent each.

Article continues after this advertisement

As for police planting evidence against drug suspects, 58 percent of respondents said this was “definitely” or “probably true,” while 33 percent were undecided.

Only 9 percent said it was “definitely” or “probably not true.”

Shared nationwide

 

Such belief seems to be shared nationwide—among 59 percent of respondents in both Metro Manila and Balance Luzon, and 56 percent in both Visayas and Mindanao.

Interestingly, the same proportion of respondents—28 percent—expressed either trust or disbelief in the police’s claim that those killed in the government’s antidrug campaign had resisted arrest. Only about two in five were undecided.

This resulted in a zero net opinion about the truthfulness of the police (percent telling the truth minus percent not telling the truth) in December, a figure unchanged from June last year.

The survey used face-to-face interviews with 1,440 respondents, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.6 percentage points.

At a Senate forum on Thursday, Sen. Nancy Binay said that even Duterte himself had admitted difficulty stamping out the illegal drug problem because of the involvement of some policemen and soldiers.

At the same time, the reelectionist senator defended the Philippine National Police and said it was doing its best to rid its ranks of scalawags.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The SWS survey results were released after Duterte vowed a “harsher” war against illegal drugs earlier this week.  —REPORTS FROM INQUIRER RESEARCH AND JULIE M. AURELIO

TAGS: Abby Binay, Drugs, EJK, involved, Malacañang, Policemen, Psnelo, Rodrigo Duterte, survey, SWS

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.