800 families face eviction from Luisita | Inquirer News

800 families face eviction from Luisita

Firm running Tarlac sugar mill says land occupants have no lease contract
/ 05:18 AM February 27, 2019

800 families face eviction from Luisita

RECOVERY The firm running Central Azucarera de Tarlac has started recovering land which, it says, is outside the coverage of the government’s land reform program in Hacienda Luisita. —TONETTE OREJAS

CITY OF SAN FERNANDO — Even as President Rodrigo Duterte promised to give lands to landless farmers, around 800 families inside Hacienda Luisita in Tarlac province, have been given notices to vacate their premises by the company that operates a sugar mill in the vast estate covered by agrarian reform since 2012.

The Central Azucarera de Tarlac (CAT) gave the families in the subvillages of Obero, Zit, Lote and Camaran at Barangay Central, 60 days to leave and demolish their dwellings, according to notices issued by the Gatchalian and Castro law office, counsel for CAT.

Article continues after this advertisement

Land acquisition

FEATURED STORIES

The notices, written in English and Filipino and dated Feb. 18, told residents it was “recover[ing] possession” of properties covered by Transfer Certificates of Title Nos. 3645, 143407 and 143406.

Those land titles were not among the 25 titles covering 4,500 hectares that were placed under compulsory acquisition by the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) in 2005.

Article continues after this advertisement

The acquisition was upheld by the Presidential Agrarian Reform Committee in 2008 and the Supreme Court in 2012, according to the compliance report of the DAR to the high court.

Article continues after this advertisement

An Inquirer source said lands at Central, located in Tarlac City, were exempted from the coverage of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program through an order issued by former Agrarian Reform Secretary Rosalina Bistoyong.

Article continues after this advertisement

Legal action

“Your occupation is without the benefit of any contract of lease and only upon the tolerance and benevolence of the family,” a part of the two-page notice read, which also warned them of legal action should they refuse to leave.

Article continues after this advertisement

It was signed by Addison Castro, CAT assistant corporate secretary. CAT officials did not reply to calls made by the Inquirer on Tuesday.

Home, farm lots

But the November 2012 resolution of the Supreme Court enforced the HLI’s promise to give home lots, measuring 240 square meters, to each of the 6,300 beneficiaries who were entitled to get 6,600 square meters of farm lots.

The Unyon ng mga Manggagawa sa Agrikultura (Uma) said it was helping fight the eviction because they had lived at Barangay Central for about 50 years. Many men in the village used to work in the mill.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

John Milton Lozande, Uma secretary general, said CAT may have been “emboldened” by DAR’s Executive Order No. 1, which makes it “easier for landlords to convert their lands for nonagricultural uses and escape land reform.”

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.