Teves: If first communion given before age 9, why can’t children aged 12 be arrested?

/ 07:08 PM January 28, 2019
Teves: If first communion given before age 9, why can’t children aged 12 be arrested?

Protest against criminalizing children

MANILA, Philippines — Negros Oriental Representative Arnolfo Teves Jr. said on Monday that if Catholic children are given their first communion, they can already determine the right from wrong and may be submitted to the justice system.

“So many people say that ages nine to 12, wala pang discernment […] Majority of Filipinos are Catholics, ang tanong ko ngayon, ilang taon pinapa-first communion ang isang Katoliko?” he asked during the regular session.


Teves, who voted in favor of House Bill 8858 that would lower the minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR) to 12 years old, said that children already ask for confession because they know they have made a mistake.

“Ang nakalagay sa Wikipedia, you are already at the age of reason when you are asked to take first communion.  Paano ka hihingi ng patawad or ask for confession kung hindi mo alam ang tama at mali?” he added.


Earlier, the House of Representatives voted 146 to 34, passing HB 8858 on the third and final reading. If enacted, this would amend R.A. 9344 or the Juvenile Justice Welfare Act of 2006 which set MACR at 15, in line with United Nations (UN) standards.

READ: House OKs on final reading bill lowering age of criminal responsibility 

Teves proposed to change the age when the first communion is administered to Catholics if people believe that children aged nine or twelve have no discernment.

“Ang tanong ko ngayon, meron na bang age of discernment ang age eight to nine?  If not, then kailangang baguhin ‘yong first communion,” the lawmaker said.

“If they say meron nang discernment, eh ‘di dapat walang umaangal sa 12 years old na age of criminal responsibility,” he explained.

According to him, people against HB 8858 should refrain from having double standards when discussing discernment concerning religion and criminal liability.

“Me, I voted yes to age of 12. I’m sure he (child) already has discernment and reason.  Hindi ko lang maintindihan bakit may double standard,” Teves said.


Sa first communion may discernment, may rason, kung sa criminal responsibility, wala pang discernment.  Which is which now?  I’d like to float that question, but still I really believe sa gano’ng edad alam mo na ‘yong tama o mali,” he noted.

Recently, different personalities and organizations — including religious groups — have criticized lawmakers who support the bill.  According to children rights advocates, lowering MACR is not applicable as the majority of crimes nationwide – around 98 percent – are still being committed by adults.

They also said that a lower MACR will do more harm than good, as organized crime syndicates would be forced to use “younger children” in their illegal activities.

READ: Child rights advocates decry move to lower age of criminal responsibility 

READ: Check realities on the ground, child advocates tell lawmakers

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: House Bill 8858, House of Representatives, MACR, minimum age of criminal responsibility, Philippine news updates
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.