Check realities on the ground, child advocates tell lawmakers | Inquirer News

Check realities on the ground, child advocates tell lawmakers

/ 02:42 PM January 22, 2019

Check realities on the ground, child advocates tell lawmakers

Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Commissioner Leah Tanodra-Armamento (extreme right) speaks at a press briefing in Quezon City on January 22, 2019. PHOTO by Gabriel Pabico Lalu/INQUIRER.net

MANILA, Philippines — Lawmakers should check the real situation on the ground before passing a bill that would lower the age of criminal liability to nine years old, children’s rights advocates said on Tuesday.

Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Commissioner Leah Tanodra-Armamento said the bill — if enacted into law — would aggravate the situation of children who are already suffering inhumane conditions inside jails and reformation facilities.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Commission on Human Rights reminds our legislators of the realities on the ground, which will be worsened by the proposed bill lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR). Everyone knows our jails are overly congested,” Tanodra-Armamento said in a press briefing inside CHR’s office in Quezon City.

FEATURED STORIES

She also said that it would be a horrendous situation both for the accosted children and the country’s jail officials.

“In fact, the subcommittee of the Prevention of Torture of the United Nations finds the Philippine detention facilities as torture by itself. So to lower the age to nine will be a nightmare not only to a child but also to the jail management,” she added.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Monday, the House of Representatives’ justice committee approved the proposed measure which will amend R.A. 9344, which has been heavily scrutinized by no less than President Rodrigo Duterte.

Article continues after this advertisement

The House leadership said the amendments are considered a priority bill because it forms part of Duterte’s legislative agenda. It is set for second reading when the House resumes its session on Tuesday afternoon.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: CHR, Unicef, rights groups protest: Why jail a 9-year-old?

Tanadro-Armamento, however, warned the measure would also place an additional burden on the judiciary.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The justice system at present is just starting to put in place the mechanism for CICL (children in conflict with the law). So to amend that at this point is to demand so much from our over-worked justice sector,” she explained.

“The proposed amendment is not supported by scientific data. On the contrary, studies show that brains mature at age 26 or later. Are the brain of the kids that ripe for decision-making?” she said.

Gabriela party-list Rep. Arlene Brosas also refuted comparisons made between the Philippines and other countries with lower MACRs.

“Sabi sa atin doon ni committee chair Rep. Doy Leachon, sa ibang bansa daw may mga six years old, eleven, ten, iilan lang ba ‘yong bansang ‘yan? And sa totoo lang, Singapore, ano ba ‘yong kondisyon na meron ang Singapore compared dito sa Pilipinas?” Brosas asked.

(Rep. Doy Leachon told us that in other countries there were six-, eleven- or ten-year-olds in jails. How many countries do that? And what is the condition in Singapore compared to the Philippines?)

“Ano ba ‘yong mga services na meron sila? Baka ‘yong realidad natin ang may problema dito tapos isa-subject natin sila (What kind of services do they have? Maybe, our realities here are problematic, and yet we are going to subject them to this)?” she added.

Majority of Senators have opposed lowering MACR to nine years old, although some said they would prefer to bring it down from 15 years old as mandated by R.A. 9344 or the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006.

READ: More senators oppose, some cold on lowering age of criminal liability

Despite the different views on the right age for MACR, lawyer Cristina Sevilla of the Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA) claimed that such proposals are senseless.

“Lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility does not make sense all. It’s not based on facts, it’s not based on evidence, not based on reality,” Sevilla, who was also present in the press conference, said.

Several personalities — elected officials, celebrities, and activists — have voiced their opposition to the proposal. Since the President assumed office in 2016, he has been adamant in bringing down MACR in the country, based on allegations that organized crime groups are using children, 15 years old and below, to promote illegal activities. /ee

READ: LP president Kiko Pangilinan ‘most stupid’ lawyer – Duterte

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

READ: Duterte says he has no personal grudge against Pangilinan 

TAGS: child rights, CHR

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.