DOJ wants state witness out of Espinosa drug case | Inquirer News

DOJ wants state witness discharged from Espinosa drug case

/ 05:56 PM December 11, 2018

Marcelo Adorco, former driver and associate of Kerwin Espinosa

Marcelo Adorco, former driver and associate of Kerwin Espinosa, submitted another affidavit to the Department of Justice on April 30, 2018. (Photo by TETCH TORRES-TUPAS / INQUIRER.net)

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has asked the Manila Regional Trial Court to discharge Marcelo Adorco, former security escort and driver of self-confessed drug distributor Kerwin Espinosa as state witness.

In a motion submitted on Monday to Manila RTC Branch 51, DOJ prosecutors said Adorco’s testimony was “absolutely necessary as there is no other direct evidence available for the proper prosecution of the offense committed.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Pending before Manila RTC Branch 51 are two counts of violation of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act, or Republic Act 9165, against Espinosa, Adorco,convicted drug lord Peter Co, witness Marcelo Adorco, Lovely Impal and Ruel Malindangan.

FEATURED STORIES

According to the DOJ, utilizing an accused as a state witness is allowed under the law to encourage “a person who has witnessed a crime or who has knowledge of its commission to come forward and testify in court…by protecting him from reprisals and shielding him from economic dislocation.”

Adorco has taken the witness stand and testified so that the court could determine if he was qualified to be discharged or not.

Article continues after this advertisement

Continuation of his testimony will be on Jan. 14, 2019.

Article continues after this advertisement

Once discharged, he will no longer be included as an accused in the case.

Article continues after this advertisement

The DOJ filed the cases against the five last July 25 after preliminary investigation conducted by a panel chaired by Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Juan Pedro Navera found ample basis in the complaint of PNP Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) for violation of section 26 (B) in relation to section 5 or Article II of R.A. 9165.

The investigating panel based its findings on the testimony of Adorco, who confessed participation in the illegal drug trade and pinpointed Espinosa, Co, Impal and Malindangan as his cohorts.

Article continues after this advertisement

The case was previously dismissed by a DOJ panel of prosecutors for lack of evidence, but because of the outrage over the dismissal of the against Lim and Espinosa that caught the ire of President Rodrigo Duterte, then Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II ordered a reinvestigation.

Aguirre eventually resigned from office. /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: DoJ

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.