Solons warn vs too hasty approval of House’s draft federal charter

/ 05:02 PM December 05, 2018
congress house of representatives

House of Representatives. INQUIRER file photo

MANILA, Philippines —  Several lawmakers on Wednesday warned against undue rush in passing the House of Representatives’ draft federal charter. 

While the minority bloc led by Quezon 3rd Dist. Rep. Danilo Suarez agrees with the need to revisit and revise the 1987 Constitution, they said Resolution of Both House of Congress (RBH) No. 15 should be scrutinized.


“Magdahan-dahan tayo. There’s absolutely no reason to rush this very important measure that will impact all of us. Let us not be like blind cows being stampeded over a cliff,” Buhay Rep. Lito Atienza, a member of the Suarez-led group, said in a statement.

Atienza also said it is “impossible to discuss this crucial measure” with just less than four session days left before Congress goes on a Christmas break on December 13.


The party-list lawmaker noted the chamber should instead focus on the need to amend the Local Government Code that fast-track the passage of RBH No. 15, which proposes a presidential-bicameral-federal system of government.

READ: House OKs draft federal charter on 2nd reading

“If these provisions on local autonomy are respected and genuinely implemented, then there would be no need to federalize,” Atienza stressed.

ACT Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio, meanwhile, condemned how the House leadership swiftly terminated the plenary debates on RBH No. 15 after only three session days of deliberations.

“Nadismaya tayo sa pag-ratsada nung pagpasa sa RBH No. 15 on second reading. Basta na lang tinapos ‘yung period of debate (last Monday), marami pang mga kasamahan tayo na nakalista for period of debate, pinutol na,” Tinio said in a press briefing.

Under the House draft, members of Congress would be elected for a term of four years. There was no term limit provided, but lawmakers should be college degree holders. The draft was also criticized for its lack of an anti-political dynasty provision.

“Ang tunay na laman at layunin nito ay unli political dynasty, unli term para sa mga pulitko, unli martial law kasi binabaan na talaga ‘yung criteria para makapag-deklara ng martial law at unli foreign plunder dahil binubukas ang ekonomiya, lupain at utility sa 100 percent foreign ownership,” Tinio pointed out.


Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas also said social justice clauses from the prevailing 1987 Constitution were scrapped under RBH No. 15.

“‘Yung social justice clauses sa Saligang Batas natin (ngayon), ‘yun ang pinagtatanggal, tulad ng land reform, workers’ rights… Ibinabalita namin sa buong kababaihan ‘yung buong women’s section on social justice tinanggal din,” Brosas said.

Although the Senate had already declared any Charter change efforts as “dead on arrival” in the upper chamber, Anakpawis Rep. Ariel Casilao said the public should “not lower (their) guards down.”

Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was quick to deny claims they railroaded RBH No. 15.

“It was part of the democratic process, there was a debate, it was voted on,” Arroyo told reporters in an interview also on Wednesday. 

READ: Arroyo denies House railroading federalism bid


Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: 1987 Constitution, Charter change, federalism, House of Representatives, Legislation, Local news, Nation, national news, news, Philippine news updates
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.