Monday, November 12, 2018
Close  
  • share this
ENOUGH EVIDENCE

Sandiganbayan checkmates Pichay over chess gambit

/ 05:33 AM October 23, 2018

The Sandiganbayan has denied the plea of Surigao del Sur Rep. Prospero Pichay Jr. to be allowed to challenge the sufficiency of the Ombudsman’s evidence in connection with his P1.5-million graft and ethical misconduct case.

In a 10-page resolution dated Oct. 17, the court’s Fifth Division said the prosecution’s evidence was strong enough, and Pichay would have to prove his innocence to avoid conviction.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court said the prosecution “adequately satisfied” the requirement to prove Pichay’s commission of the crime and his participation in the alleged misuse of public funds for a 2010 international chess tournament held in his honor.

At the time, Pichay was also the acting chair of the Local Water Utilities Administration’s (LWUA) board of trustees and the president of the National Chess Federation of the Philippines.

FEATURED STORIES

“There is more than prima facie evidence of Pichay’s conflict of interest,” the court said, pointing out that LWUA’s sponsorship of the chess event required his approval.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: graft case, international chess tournament, LWUA, National Chess Federation of the Philippines, Office of the Ombudsman, Prospero Pichay Jr., Sandiganbayan
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2018 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.