Gov’t aid to college students cut by P3.2B | Inquirer News

Gov’t aid to college students cut by P3.2B

Prospero de Vera III —JOANBONDOC

Prospero de Vera III. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO/JOAN BONDOC

Most of the more than 350,000 tertiary students receiving stipends from government are expected to lose the lifeline next year as the budget for the “Tulong Dunong” program has been drastically cut to P1.1 billion from P4.1 billion.

Tulong Dunong, a needs-based scholarship, is one of the  Commission on Higher Education (CHEd’s) student financial assistance programs, the budget for which in 2019 has been slashed by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) to P1.7 billion from this year’s P4.9 billion.

Article continues after this advertisement

Scholars under Tulong Dunong, whether from public or private colleges or universities, receive stipends ranging from P6,000 to P12,000 yearly.

FEATURED STORIES

Medical students

CHEd officer in charge J. Prospero de Vera III said on Tuesday that the huge cuts in the student financial assistance programs would also adversely affect some 1,200 students taking medicine in eight state universities and colleges (SUCs).

Article continues after this advertisement

De Vera said not a single peso had been approved by the DBM for these medical students for 2019.

Article continues after this advertisement

No funding had been allocated for the program for medical students for this year, but  after deliberations in Congress, around P250 million was finally realigned for the scholarship program.

Article continues after this advertisement

Rebel returnees studying at SUCs under the “Payapa at Masaganang Pamayanan” program also stand to lose financial aid, after the DBM decided against setting aside a budget for it.

De Vera said that the CHEd had raised the matter to Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process Jesus Dureza, whose office oversees the program.

Article continues after this advertisement

Expenses despite no tuition

“For Tulong Dunong, it is the belief that because tuition and miscellaneous fees are already free, there is no more need for it,” he said at a press briefing.

He was referring to the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education Act, which allowed free education in SUCs.

But De Vera noted that despite the free tuition law, continuing education costs remained a problem, particularly for students from poor families.

“What the CHEd did when tuition was already free was to authorize that the Tulong Dunong funds be converted into stipends for book and transportation allowance, among others,” he said.

Limited TES slots

De Vera said the worst hit would be recipients from private universities.

“They will have no more assistance from the national government to offset their tuition costs,” he said.

Those affected may opt to apply for the Tertiary Education Subsidy (TES) program, which offers a scholarship grant of P40,000 yearly.

Slots are limited, however, to around 300,000 scholars, and TES prioritizes students from poorer families and those enrolled in private schools in areas that do not have existing state universities.

Despite the cuts, De Vera expressed optimism that hearings in Congress would still usher some changes in the funding for the financial aid to tertiary students.

“We have already brought this to the attention of the House of Representatives and they have promised to look into it and see what they can do,” he said.

DepEd budget

In the Senate, lawmakers said they would work to restore at least half of the 2019 budget of the Department of Education (DepEd).

Sen. Bam Aquino, who on Wednesday led the hearing on DepEd’s 2019 budget, noted that the agency should have enough funds to build at least 10,000 classrooms next year.

He said giving the DepEd anything less was “unwise” as this would mean that the government would have to triple efforts by 2020 just so there would be an adequate number of classrooms throughout the country.

For this year, DepEd’s budget for its basic education facilities program stands at more than P105.5 million.

This includes the construction of 47,000 new classrooms and 5,913 technical-vocational laboratories.

For 2019, however, the DBM cut the program’s funding by 67 percent, giving the DepEd only P34.7 million.

This means that next year the DepEd would have funds to build only 4,110 new classrooms and 1,320 technical-vocational laboratories.

Counterintuitive

Sen. Risa Hontiveros said the cut was illogical and “counterintuitive,” given that there was a need to continually build  and rebuild classrooms.

DepEd data show that there are more than 757,000 classrooms nationwide. With a student growth rate of 1.7 percent, the department needs to have at least 10,000 new classrooms annually.

This is on top of the additional 40,000 classrooms that the DepEd also needs to build  so that it could further reduce class sizes.

Currently, each classroom holds 33 elementary students or 36 junior high school students.

Since the proposed budget covers the construction of only a little more than 4,000 classrooms, Aquino said it was important for the budget to be restored to around 50 percent so that the bare minimum requirement of building 10,000 classrooms could be met.

Earlier, the DepEd said that despite the budget cut there would be no classroom shortage as 81,630 classrooms were expected to be turned over by December 2019.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Under the cash-based budgeting system that the government will implement next year, agencies are required to spend their budget within the fiscal year, with an extension of six months for payments.

TAGS: Ched, DBM, Tulong Dunong

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.