DOJ indicts Kerwin, Co, 2 others for drug trading | Inquirer News

DOJ indicts Kerwin, Co, 2 others for drug trading

/ 06:40 AM July 20, 2018

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has reversed a Jan. 18 resolution that cleared confessed drug lord Kerwin Espinosa, convicted drug lord Peter Co, and two alleged drug suppliers of drug trading charges.

In a decision released on Thursday, a new panel of state prosecutors indicted Espinosa, Co, Lovely Impal and Ruel Malindangan for violating the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act.

The case will be filed in the Makati City Regional Trial Court on Friday.

Article continues after this advertisement

Malacañang was pleased with the new resolution. Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque said the wheels of justice were now turning to hold the suspects accountable.

FEATURED STORIES

The DOJ has not yet resolved whether to uphold its original decision to clear businessman Peter Lim of the same charges, as Lim has asked for a separate preliminary probe.

 

Article continues after this advertisement

Deaths of 3 suspects

Article continues after this advertisement

The new resolution also acknowledged the deaths of three of the suspects: Max Miro, Nestor Pepito and Rowen Reyes Secretaria. Ten other respondents were identified only by their aliases.

Article continues after this advertisement

A panel composed of Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Juan Pedro Navera as chair with Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Anna Devanadera and Prosecution Attorney Herbert Abugan as members reversed the decision reached by the original panel last December.

Acting on the complaint of the Philippine National Police Criminal Investigation and Detection Group, the new panel said it also based its decision to indict Espinosa and the others on the testimony of drug-dealer-turned-state-witness Marcelo Adorco.

Article continues after this advertisement

Not necessary

Disputing Espinosa’s argument that the police never proved that he had possessed “shabu” (crystal meth), the DOJ panel said the confiscation of illegal drugs was not necessary to establish liability.

“Conspiracy to commit illegal drug trading is an offense distinct from drug trading… The agreement to trade in drugs is the gravamen (most serious part) of such an offense. The drugs themselves as corpus delicti of the drug trading is not necessary under Section 28 (B) of the law,” the panel said in the resolution approved by acting Prosecutor General Richard Fadullon.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The panel also used Espinosa’s testimony in the Senate last year detailing his drug transactions in the Visayas. —WITH A REPORT FROM JULIE M. AURELIO

TAGS: drug trading

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.