Exec busted for faking drug arrests | Inquirer News

Exec busted for faking drug arrests

/ 12:54 AM May 29, 2011

A former councilor of Dapitan City has been busted, not for illegal drugs, but for faking drug busts in order to collect money from the government.

The Sandiganbayan Second Division sentenced Ricardo Inding to 6-10 years in prison and disqualified him from ever holding public office after it found him guilty of scamming the city government of P30,500.

Inding was accused of faking drug busts against alleged drug pushers and users in 1997 and falsifying documents so that he could claim reimbursement for supposed expenses.

Article continues after this advertisement

The antigraft court said Inding made it appear that he headed the committee on illegal drugs of the Sangguniang Panlunsod of Dapitan City, when no such committee existed.

FEATURED STORIES

What he chaired was the committee on tourism and he was also a member of the committees on youth and sports development, and on health and sanitation, the court said.

It said Inding’s confidential report on the supposed drug operations showed that surveillance, test buys and busts were conducted from January to August 1997, but only two arrests were made as shown by police records. The records, however, did not mention Inding or credit the arrests to his antidrug campaign.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Sandiganbayan also said that the documents Inding submitted to support his reimbursement claims included community tax certificates whose dates of issuance did not tally with official records.

Article continues after this advertisement

The tax certificates were issued to purported members of the raiding team by Inding’s cousin, barangay treasurer Efrina Inding.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court said it got the impression that the members of the team were fictitious.

“In this case, accused created a fictitious committee that undertook fictitious activities involving fictitious persons, for the purpose of obtaining, as he obtained, a sum of money from government coffers. He did a wrong for his own interest. That is evident bad faith,” the Sandiganbayan said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court also noted that while Inding was given the opportunity to present evidence in his defense, he did not do so. Leila B. Salaverria

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.