Duterte’s promise to resign after federal Constitution is ratified only a bluff? | Inquirer News

Duterte’s promise to resign after federal Constitution is ratified only a bluff?

/ 06:17 PM July 17, 2018

Updated (6:59 p.m.)

President Rodrigo Duterte’s promise to resign once the federal Constitution is ratified is just a bluff, a political analyst said Tuesday.

University of the Philippine political science Professor Gene Pilapil said it’s difficult to take the President seriously because he promised time and time again to resign over many issues that irritate him.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This promise to resign in 2019 might yet be of the same weight as his campaign promise in 2016 to resign if after the first six months of his presidency he did not eradicate drugs and corruption in the country,” Pilapil said during the Senate inquiry on Charter change (Cha-cha).

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Palace on 2022 reelection ban: Duterte has no other motives

The professor assailed the Consultative Committee (Con-Com) tasked to review the 1987 Constitution for producing a draft charter that lacks a clear transition plan.

Article continues after this advertisement

“My reading here is that his promise to resign come 2019 is simultaneously a bluff and indicative of the lack of seriousness in the output of his own Con-com,” he said, adding that the President probably knows very well that the real writing of the constitution will happen in Congress.

Article continues after this advertisement

“With his lieutenants fully in control of the House [of Representatives], no way would they allow him to bid them goodbye midway in his term,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Pilapil acknowledged, however, that the ban on Duterte’s re-election is a “significant step in the right direction.”

Upon the request of the President, the Con-com inserted a provision in the draft charter that would prohibit President Duterte from seeking reelection when the government reboots as a result of Charter change.

Article continues after this advertisement

“One key institutional challenge to protect democracy is to commit the final output of Congress, if ever, to contain this crucial ban,” Pilapil emphasized. /ee

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: federalism, Gene Pilapil, Rodrigo Duterte

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.