CA upholds Maute member’s conviction for possession of blasting cap | Inquirer News

CA upholds Maute member’s conviction for possession of blasting cap

By: - Reporter / @zacariansINQ
/ 10:32 AM August 12, 2024

foreign terrorist basilan grenade

A rifle grenade, a hand grenade, a blasting cap, and detonation devices were confiscated from foreigners arrested in Basilan. | File photo TETCH TORRES-TUPAS / INQUIRER.nt

MANILA, Philippines —  The Court of Appeals (CA) has affirmed a court’s conviction of a Maute member for possession of contraband.

The case stemmed from a decision of the Taguig City Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 266, which found Nasifa Pundug guilty beyond reasonable doubt for violating Presidential Decree No. 1866 and Republic Act 9516, or the unlawful manufacture, sales, acquisition, disposal, importation, or possession of an explosive device or ancillary device.

Article continues after this advertisement

The accused, for her part, appealed the conviction and contested the ruling by citing the “chain of custody rule,” or a protocol mandated by law to check the veracity of evidence obtained in illegal drug cases.

FEATURED STORIES

But in a 16-page decision dated June 25, the CA ruled that the contention of the accused was bereft of merit.

“In the case at hand, the chain of custody rule does not apply to an undetonated grenade (an object made unique) for it is not amorphous and its form is relatively resistant to change. A witness of the prosecution need only identify the hand grenade, a structural object, based on personal knowledge that the same article is what it purports to be,” the CA decision reads.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Denial and alibi cannot prevail over the positive identification of assailants by the witnesses unless substantiated by clear and convincing proof,” it added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The appellate court also noted the presumption of regularity in the military’s confiscation of the blasting cap, explaining that the contraband was sensitive to markings where even a camera flash would be enough to detonate it.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Wherefore, viewed in the light of the foregoing, the instant Appeal is denied,” the CA decision ruled.

READ: Maute head’s wife nabbed, bomber killed in GenSan raid

Article continues after this advertisement

It was on August 22, 2016, when Pundug was arrested for possession of a blasting cap during a random checkpoint in Lanao Del Sur.

Pundug was reportedly apprehended along with seven other people alleged to be members of the Maute terrorist group, with other contraband confiscated, including an 81-millimeter mortar ammunition, a pipe bomb, and other suspicious items.

Meanwhile, the DOJ, in a statement on Monday, tagged the CA decision as a “win against terrorism.”

“This court ruling is another testament of the State’s zealousness in administering the law, proving yet again that evil shall never triumph over justice,” Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Pundug’s conviction is a big boost in the government’s fight against terrorism,” he pointed out.

TAGS: Bombs, DoJ, Maute, Remulla, Terrorism

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.