Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Headlines / Metro Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Inquirer Headlines > Metro

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




 OTHER COLUMNS


imns



CA asked to void EO 003 banning contraceptives

By Leila Salaverria
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 23:59:00 01/30/2008

Filed Under: Women, Family, Local authorities

MANILA, Philippines ? Twenty residents from depressed areas in the City of Manila yesterday asked the Court of Appeals to nullify Executive Order 003 which they said deprived them of their right to practice responsible parenthood.

Among those who filed the petition were Alexander Pesimo and his wife, Victoria, who have six children. Alexander works as a guard at a billiard hall and earns around P150 to P300 a day.

According to Victoria, she used to get her supply of oral contraceptives from the Manila Health Center. But after then Manila Mayor Lito Atienza signed the order in February 2000, Victoria said she could no longer get birth pills from the city?s health centers. As a result, she gave birth to six children over the years because she could not afford to buy the pills on her own.

TRO

The Pesimos and the other petitioners also asked the court to issue a temporary restraining order against the implementation of the EO which ?upholds natural family planning? and discourages ?the use of artificial methods of contraception like condoms, pills, intrauterine devices, surgical sterilization, and other.?

They said that by implementing the EO, the respondents ? the Office of the City Mayor and the Manila City Health Department ? prejudiced their right to health and well-being.

According to the petitioners, the ban resulted in the deterioration of their reproductive health because it deprived them of access to health care and health development and resulted in numerous pregnancies. The poor are the most affected, they added.

Economic hardship

?In the meantime, petitioners? children suffer the consequences of economic hardship and higher risk of infant mortality brought about by the strain of multiple unintended pregnancies left unaddressed by the respondents? token implementation of a natural family planning program to the complete exclusion of access to available and affordable artificial methods of contraception,? they said.

Lawyer Harry Roque, who represents the petitioners, said they filed the case only now because his clients were apprehensive about the repercussions of filing a suit against Atienza while he was still mayor.

Atienza was appointed environment secretary last year after he finished his third and last term as city mayor in June.

Elizabeth Pangalangan, who also represents the petitioners, said her clients met earlier with Mayor Alfredo Lim to talk to him about recalling the order, but the latter seemed reluctant to do so.

She added that it was better to let the court decide whether or not the EO violated the Constitution and the country?s laws so that other local government units would be guided accordingly.

According to the petitioners, Atienza violated the government?s constitutional duty to defend their right to found a family consistent with their religious convictions and the demands of responsible parenthood.

They claimed that the EO favors only natural family planning methods and thus imposes a single or unitary view of family planning on all Manila residents, depriving them of any ?real? or ?informed? choice.



Copyright 2014 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2014 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Philippine Fiesta
TAGAYTAY FONTAINE VILLAS
DZIQ 990
Pacquiao