Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Sta Lucia Realty

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:



Affiliates

 
Breaking News / World Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Breaking News > World

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  





imns



Boycotts mar climate talks in US and Spain


Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 05:49:00 11/05/2009

Filed Under: Global Warming, Conflicts (general), Politics, Foreign affairs & international relations, Diplomacy

Boycotts on either side of the Atlantic on Tuesday showed just how difficult it will be to clinch an agreement on global warming next month.

At UN climate talks in Barcelona, Spain, African nations walked out of meetings to protest rich nations’ reluctance to make substantial carbon-cutting commitments.

In Washington, some conservative Republicans boycotted the start of committee debate on a bill to curb greenhouse gases, fearful of the cost to the US economy.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in a bid to support the Democratic-sponsored climate bill, told a rare joint session of Congress “there is no time to lose” in tackling climate change.

But the lukewarm response to her comments on global warming—in contrast to the ovations she received at other times—only underscored the skeptical mood in the United States about climate action, which would require a shift away from fossil fuels to wind and solar power, smaller cars and—the Republicans argue—more expense to consumers.

Republican senators on the chamber’s environment and public works committee shunned the planned startup of voting on amendments to the bill. Only Sen. George Voinovich showed up and he stayed only for 15 minutes to give the reasons for the Republicans’ absence.

African countries ended a boycott of meetings in Spain at UN climate negotiations, having reset the talks’ agenda to spend more time on complaints that industrial countries had set carbon-cutting targets too low for reducing global greenhouse gas emissions.

The parallel actions were elements of a dramatic finale leading up to the 192-nation conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18, which is meant to adopt a treaty regulating carbon emissions that will shake economies around the globe.

African revolt

The African revolt was largely symbolic, since it was clear that industrial countries cannot alter their positions without high-level political decisions by governments.

But it was a signal that hardliners would dominate negotiations by the developing countries at the decisive Copenhagen forum, and marked the 50-nation African group as an influential player on the global stage.

The Africans, supported by about 70 other developing countries, including China, say the industrial world is failing to live up to pledges of deep cuts in emissions, while droughts and floods already are causing death and devastation on the badly hit continent.

“I don’t think we can get to a result in the way we’re going now,” said Algerian negotiator Kamel Djemouai, who chairs the Africa group. “The figures that are now on the table are not really ambitious.”

The White House and Democratic leaders in Congress have essentially abandoned prospects of getting a climate bill to President Barack Obama’s desk before the Copenhagen meeting.

But they hope a show of progress in the Senate—along with the House having passed a bill and Obama’s call for more fuel-efficient cars—will show the world the United States is taking climate change seriously.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon acknowledged the climate change treaty may not be resolved this year, adding that nations may be unable to commit to firm emissions limits at Copenhagen.

“We may not be able to agree [on] all the words,” Ban said after meeting in London with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

No specifics

Ban said he would push leaders to strike a pact in Copenhagen, but that it was more likely to be an agreement on principles—rather than specific targets for cuts.

“We need at this time the political will—if there is a political will, there is a way we can come to a binding agreement in Copenhagen,” Ban said.

Scientists say industrial countries should reduce emissions by 25 percent to 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, but the targets announced so far amount to far less than the minimum.

The Africans say new climate studies show the dangers are even greater than thought just a few years ago, and that industrial nations should reduce emissions by at least 40 percent by 2020.

The US delegation has refused to say what its figure will be until it gets a green light from Congress.

Strong signal

“It’s really good that the Africans have finally been able to stand up together,” said Fiona Musana of Greenpeace Africa. “That sends a strong signal.”

A new study published on Tuesday says the glaciers on Africa’s highest mountain, Kilimanjaro, have lost 85 percent of the ice they had in 1912, with more than a quarter present in 2000 gone by 2007.

The study, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, cited Earth’s rising temperatures as at least a partial cause. It said similar changes have occurred at Mount Kenya and the Rwenzori Mountains in Africa, as well as at glaciers in South America and the Himalayas.

Climate negotiators are closely watching events in Washington. The standoff in the Senate committee was precisely the kind of confrontation that aroused concern among the delegates and calls for the United States to declare its intentions before the Copenhagen meeting.

Clinton, Bush inaction

The Copenhagen measure would succeed the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which called on 37 industrial countries to reduce heat-raising gas emissions by an average 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. It made no demands on developing countries such as India and China.

The Clinton administration signed the protocol but never sent it to the Senate for ratification, saying it wanted the agreement to include developing nations first. The treaty is not binding on the United States unless the Senate ratifies it.

Then, former President George W. Bush said he would not send it to the Senate for ratification, making the United States the only country to have signed the accord to say it has no intention of ratifying it.

Merkel assured Congress that China and India would agree to accept limits on their own carbon emissions as part of a Copenhagen pact if the United States did.

Obama’s turn

After meeting the German leader in the White House, Obama reiterated his determination to join an international climate regime.

“The United States, Germany and countries around the world, I think, are all beginning to recognize why it is so important that we work in common in order to stem the potential catastrophe that can result if we continue to see global warming continue unabated,” Obama said.

He also met with European Union leaders hoping to advance a climate policy. He said he and the European leaders agreed it was imperative that they redouble efforts to reach a climate deal in Copenhagen.

Associated Press


Copyright 2009 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:


  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Megaworld
Filinvest
Property Guide
Xoom
Inquirer VDO