Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Sta Lucia Realty

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Breaking News / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Breaking News > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  






imns



Price is right for anti-lice shampoo, says Department of Education

By Philip Tubeza
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 21:06:00 10/20/2009

Filed Under: Graft & Corruption, Health, Education, News

MANILA, Philippines -- A Department of Education official said on Tuesday there was no overprice in the procurement of anti-lice shampoo and medical equipment by the DepEd, and that critics were comparing prices of different products.

Dr. Maria Corazon C. Dumlao, officer in charge of the DepEd Health and Nutrition Center (HNC), said the anti-lice Lycare citronella shampoo (purchased at P12 per unit) was different from the Licealiz brand (P9.92) because the latter’s active ingredient was pyrethrin and not citronella.

“No, there was no overprice in the procurement of citronella shampoo,” Dumlao said, adding that the market price of citronella shampoo had actually gone up to P18.

She said the HNC chose citronella because other anti-lice shampoos were “chemical-based and have toxic effects…and may even cause death in severe cases.”

Dumlao said citronella’s side effects were minimal: “Slight reddening and itchiness of the scalp.”

On the other hand, a pyrethrin-based shampoo like Licealiz had several side effects, including contact dermatitis, difficulty in breathing, asthma, pruritus, numbness and edema or rashes.

Dumlao said the DepEd had a P900,000 budget to buy 75,000 sachets of citronella shampoo but no payments had been made because the Bureau of Food and Drugs was still reviewing the product.

On the alleged overprice of otoscopes, Dumlao said the DepEd was buying instruments called “diagnostic sets” and not ordinary otoscopes, which would be used to examine the ear canal.

She said a “diagnostic set” was an otoscope combined with an ophthalmoscope (used to check the eyes). While ordinary penlight otoscopes cost P120 to P200, the market price of a “diagnostic set” is P12,000 to P15,000.

The DepEd was also studying whether to proceed with its controversial P427-million “fortified noodle” program after an official review found no irregularity in the project’s bidding process, said Education Undersecretary Franklin Sunga.



Copyright 2010 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Share


OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2010 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Megaworld
BizLinq
Themes and Motifs
Xoom
Inquirer VDO